Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 4:. (a) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of SAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (b) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of DAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (c) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of TAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (d) Sensitivity analysis by excluding the outlier from the comparison of DAP and CH. (e) Sensitivity analysis by excluding the outlier from the comparison of TAP and CH

Figure 4:. (a) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of SAP and CH on <i>E. faecalis</i> biofilm. (b) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of DAP and CH on <i>E. faecalis</i> biofilm. (c) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of TAP and CH on <i>E. faecalis</i> biofilm. (d) Sensitivity analysis by excluding the outlier from the comparison of DAP and CH. (e) Sensitivity analysis by excluding the outlier from the comparison of TAP and CH