Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 2: (a) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of TAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm (negative interval favors antibiotic). (b) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of DAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (c) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of mTAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (d) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of SAPs and CH on E. faecalis biofilm (negative interval favors antibiotic).

Figure 2: (a) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of TAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm (negative interval favors antibiotic). (b) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of DAP and CH on <i>E. faecalis</i> biofilm. (c) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of mTAP and CH on <i>E. faecalis</i> biofilm. (d) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of SAPs and CH on <i>E. faecalis</i> biofilm (negative interval favors antibiotic).