Journal of Conservative Dentistry

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 487--491

Analysis of root morphology and internal anatomy of 400 maxillary first premolars using cone-beam computed tomography in an Indian Dravidian subpopulation: An ex vivo study


S Nath Kartik1, Karthik Shetty1, Bettina Ashwini Vergis2, Srikant Natarajan3, Janina Loren D'Souza1,  
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Srinivas Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Karthik Shetty
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore. Affiliated to Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka
India

Abstract

Background: There have been numerous cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) studies done over the years to analyze the canal configurations among various racial and ethnic population groups. Several of these studies have highlighted a certain consistency in the incidence of particular features within these population subsets. Aim: The study aimed to analyze the root morphology and canal configurations of the maxillary first premolar (Mx1PM) in the Indian Dravidian subpopulation using CBCT. Setting and Design: This study involved a retrospective analysis of 200 CBCT scans, which included 400 Mx1PM. Methods: The CBCT images were evaluated, and the number of roots and canal configurations was recorded as per the Vertucci's classification. Statistical Analysis: Variations in the number of roots and canal anatomies were statistically interpreted using the Chi-square test of association with the significance level set at P < 0.05. Results: Among the 400 Mx1PM studied, 116 (29%) teeth displayed single roots and 284 (71%) showed the presence of two roots. The single-rooted premolars revealed a varied canal configuration with a predominance of Vertucci's Type II configuration in around 53.4% of the Mx1PM. The two-rooted premolars revealed 100% Type I canal configuration. Conclusion: The Mx1PM studied predominantly showed the two-rooted morphology with independent canals in each root. There was no significant difference between the teeth on either side of the same arch. The CBCT is an excellent nondestructive modality that can help us study the internal anatomy of pulp space accurately.



How to cite this article:
Kartik S N, Shetty K, Vergis BA, Natarajan S, D'Souza JL. Analysis of root morphology and internal anatomy of 400 maxillary first premolars using cone-beam computed tomography in an Indian Dravidian subpopulation: An ex vivo study.J Conserv Dent 2022;25:487-491


How to cite this URL:
Kartik S N, Shetty K, Vergis BA, Natarajan S, D'Souza JL. Analysis of root morphology and internal anatomy of 400 maxillary first premolars using cone-beam computed tomography in an Indian Dravidian subpopulation: An ex vivo study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 1 ];25:487-491
Available from: https://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2022/25/5/487/355899


Full Text



 Introduction



The ability of the clinician to completely debride and comprehensively obturate the entire root canal space is the basic premise of root canal therapy. Thorough knowledge and understanding of the root canal space and their variations are considered the norm to achieve predictable success. A failure on the part of the clinician to detect and debride adequately or seal one or more of the root canals could be the precursor to subsequent endodontic treatment failure.[1],[2]

While studies on the internal anatomy of teeth have previously involved laborious techniques, the introduction of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has proved to be pathbreaking in terms of endodontic diagnosis and research. The CBCT is a technically superior method to study root canal anatomy in the clinical setting owing to the noninvasive way it evaluates the three-dimensional anatomy of the tooth.[3],[4]

Several studies conducted among different racial and geographical population groups have demonstrated the increased prevalence of variations in the canal configurations of the maxillary premolars.[2],[5],[6],[7] Despite the enigmatic presentation of root form and canal morphology in the case of maxillary first premolar (Mx1PM), very few studies have been conducted among Indian population groups concerning the same[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] [Table 1].{Table 1}

The Indian population has an amalgamation of racial features and multiple ethnicities. American anthropologist Carleton Coon reported that “India is the easternmost outpost of the Caucasian racial region” and defined the Indid race that occupies the Indian subcontinent as beginning in the Khyber pass.[23],[24] While the northern populations are deemed to be Indo-Aryans, the southern populations of India are called as Dravidian and present with their own unique and distinguishable traits.[25]

Interestingly, our literature review revealed that few studies have been conducted to study the root and canal anatomy of (Mx1PM) among the south Indian subpopulations of Dravidian descent.[8],[12],[14] In addition, to our knowledge, no CBCT study has been conducted to study the anatomy of Mx1PM among an Indian Dravidian subpopulation group till date.

Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate the number of roots and internal anatomy of the Mx1PM in an Indian Dravidian subpopulation employing CBCT as a diagnostic tool.

 Methods



This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (Protocol no. 15106).The sample size was set at 400, which was calculated using the formula [INSIDE:1] with 95% confidence level and 80% power with respect to P = 50.[5] CBCT records of 200 patients who were prescribed CBCT scans as an adjunctive diagnostic tool during routine dental treatment at the dental school were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 400 Mx1PM from these CBCT records were scrutinized.

Scans that showed intact, fully developed Mx1PM bilaterally were included, and teeth that were compromised by physiological or pathological processes or where the original root anatomy was not precise were excluded.

Radiologic evaluation

The CBCT images were selected from the database of the Planmeca Promax 3D mid unit imaging system (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). The CBCT images were taken with operating parameters set at 5.6 mA, 90 kV, and 27 s exposure time for small FOV, 8 mA, 90 kV, and 12 s exposure time for medium FOV. Romexis Viewer software was used to analyze images on a 21-inch LCD Dell monitor with a resolution of 1024 × 768 pixels (Dell Computer Corporation, Round Rock, TX, USA). The saturation and brightness of the scans were adjusted by means of a processing tool in the software to ensure optimum visualization. The CBCT images were examined by two endodontists individually. Each scan was studied in the coronal, sagittal, and axial views. The images were scrolled from buccal to palatal, mesial to distal, and from CEJ to apex to evaluate the canal morphology [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

The following details were documented and analyzed:

Tooth position relative to the side of the archNumber of roots, categorized as per the guidelines stated by Pécora et al.[5]Canal configuration, classified as per the Vertucci's criteria.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Product and Service solutions, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used. The differences and frequency in the root number and canal anatomy in accordance with the tooth position were statistically interpreted using the Chi-square test of association with a significance level set at P < 0.05. The inter-examiner agreement between the two endodontists was evaluated using the Cohen's Kappa test (ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 0.81–0.99 indicating almost perfect agreement, as proposed by Viera and Garrett).[26]

 Results



Of the 400 Mx1PM, 116 teeth (29%) displayed single-root morphology, while 284 teeth (71%) showed the presence of two roots.

The study of the individual canal configurations in the two-rooted Mx1PM revealed a complete presentation of Vertucci's Type I in 100% both buccal and palatal roots.

Among the single-rooted Mx1PM, 53.4% of the teeth had Type II configuration, while 21.6% had Type IV configuration. Type I configuration was seen in 12.59% of the teeth. Types III and V configurations together were observed in 12.41% of the teeth [Table 2].{Table 2}

A bilateral comparison of the premolars did not show a significant difference in terms of the number of roots present (P > 0.05) [Table 2]. This indicates that symmetry in terms of the number of roots can be a normal assumption.

The overall Kappa value for inter-examiner agreement was 0.89, indicating a very good agreement between the two examiners.

 Discussion



The data regarding root canal morphology available in textbooks have been historically done from the Caucasoid point of view. In contrast, research into racial variations has proved divergence from popularly accepted norms.[27],[28]

The Mx1PM, in particular, has also shown variations in regard to the number of roots present in the Mongoloid versus the Caucasian populations.[28]

Our review of the literature shows the prevalence of two roots being predominant in most of the populations (61%–75%) with few exceptions [Table 1]. A study by de Lima et al.[22] in the Brazilian population showed a predominance of single-rooted Mx1PM in 80.2% of the cases. Another variation was noted by Senan et al.[21] in the Yemeni population in their study, which showed an 54.8% prevalence of one-rooted first premolars. The studies on the Indian population have not been definitive [Table 1].

There is an almost equal prevalence of single- and double-rooted premolars in most studies except one by Neelakantan et al.[10] where they found 84% prevalence of two roots in the south Indian population. Theruvil et al.[29] and Rekha et al.[30] reported and treated cases with the presence of three canals and three roots in the Mx1PM.

As the data regarding the root canal morphology are one of the most important tools for the clinician in their arsenal when planning to treat an endodontic case, the relevance of the information specific to the local population is essential. Another fringe benefit of such studies is their ability to shed more light into the origins of the local populations from an anthropological perspective.

With this in mind, the present study deals with the internal anatomy of Mx1PM of a South Indian Dravidian subpopulation using stored CBCT records in a retrospective manner and aims to add to the documented literature on the same.

 Conclusion



Majority of the Mx1PM were double rooted with Type I canal configuration in all the canals studiedThe single-rooted Mx1PM showed variations in the canal configurations, and the Type II canal configuration was dominant.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top 2005;10:3-29.
2Cantatore G, Berutti E, Castellucci A. Missed anatomy: Frequency and clinical impact. Endod Top 2006;15:3-31.
3Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:114-9.
4Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod 2010;36:1547-51.
5Pécora JD, Saquy PC, Sousa Neto MD, Woelfel JB. Root form and canal anatomy of maxillary first premolars. Braz Dent J 1992;2:87-94.
6Carns EJ, Skidmore AE. Configurations and deviations of root canals of maxillary first premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:880-6.
7Pécora JD, Sousa Neto MD, Saquy PC, Woelfel JB. In vitro study of root canal anatomy of maxillary second premolars. Braz Dent J 1993;3:81-5.
8Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy D. Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent 2015;9:500-7.
9Jayasimha Raj U, Mylswamy S. Root canal morphology of maxillary second premolars in an Indian population. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:148-51.
10Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV. Root and canal morphology of Indian maxillary premolars by a modified root canal staining technique. Odontology 2011;99:18-21.
11Gupta S, Sinha DJ, Gowhar O, Tyagi SP, Singh NN, Gupta S. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolar teeth in North Indian population using clearing technique: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2015;18:232-6.
12Karunakaran JV, Kaliyaperumal A, Nagappan R, Swaminathan SK, Arthanari KK, Sujith Samuel L. Root form and morphology of human permanent maxillary first premolars of an Indo-Dravidian population based in southern India: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2020;12:S601-6.
13Karunakaran JV, Ganeshamoorthy T, Anbarasi K, Ragavendran N, Karthick AK. Maxillary permanent first premolars with three canals: Incidence analysis using cone beam computerized tomographic techniques. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11:S474-80.
14Dinakar C, Shetty UA, Salian VV, Shetty P. Root canal morphology of maxillary first premolars using the clearing technique in a South Indian population: An in vitro study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2018;8:143-7.
15Wolf TG, Kozaczek C, Siegrist M, Betthäuser M, Paqué F, Briseño-Marroquín B. An ex vivo study of root canal system configuration and morphology of 115 maxillary first premolars. J Endod 2020;46:794-800.
16Liu X, Gao M, Ruan J, Lu Q. Root canal anatomy of maxillary first premolar by microscopic computed tomography in a Chinese adolescent subpopulation. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:4327046.
17Maghfuri S, Keylani H, Chohan H, Dakkam S, Atiah A, Mashyakhy M. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary first premolars by cone beam computed tomography in Saudi Arabian southern region subpopulation: An in vitro study. Int J Dent 2019;2019:2063943.
18Pan JY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:14.
19Saber SE, Ahmed MH, Obeid M, Ahmed HM. Root and canal morphology of maxillary premolar teeth in an Egyptian subpopulation using two classification systems: A cone beam computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2019;52:267-78.
20Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, Alsubait S. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a Saudi population. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:8170620.
21Senan EM, Alhadainy HA, Genaid TM, Madfa AA. Root form and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars of a Yemeni population. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:94.
22de Lima CO, de Souza LC, Devito KL, do Prado M, Campos CN. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Aust Endod J 2019;45:196-201.
23Coon CS. The Races of Europe. New York: Macmillan Co.;1939. p. 287.
24Coon CS, Hunt EE. The Living Races of Man. London Cape: Jonathan Cape Ltd; 1966. p. 207.
25Kuiper K. The culture of India. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing; 2010. p. 71.
26Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360-3.
27Walker RT. Root form and canal anatomy of maxillary first premolars in a southern Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987;3:130-4.
28Martins JN, Marques D, Silva EJ, Caramês J, Versiani MA. Prevalence studies on root canal anatomy using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: A systematic review. J Endod 2019;45:372-86.e4.
29Theruvil R, Ganesh C, George AC. Endodontic management of a maxillary first and second premolar with three canals. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:88-91.
30Rekha SG, Nadig P, Nadig G. Endodontic treatment of a maxillary first premolar with three roots: A case report. J Conserv Dent 2005;8:26.