Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 155
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

    Article Cited by others

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study

Tambe Varsha Harshal, Nagmode Pradnya Sunil, Abraham Sathish, Patait Mahendra, Lahoti Pratik Vinod, Jaju Neha

Year : 2014| Volume: 17| Issue : 6 | Page no: 561-565

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Comparative evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary and reciprocating file systems using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
Tanisha Singh, Manju Kumari, Rohit Kochhar
Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2023; 26(3): 332
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of sequential rotary, single rotary, and single reciprocating file systems in simulated curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
PSenthamil Selvan, RV Aparajitha, AShafie Ahamed, S Bhavani, G Rajaraman
Endodontology. 2022; 34(1): 55
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Comparative Assessment of the Shaping Ability of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Gold in Simulated Root Canals
Laura Orel, Oana-Alexandra Velea-Barta, Cosmin Sinescu, Virgil-Florin Duma, Lumini?a-Maria Nica, Razvan Mihai Horhat, Raul Dorin Chirila, Anca Tudor, Dan-Dumitru Vulcanescu, Meda Lavinia Negrutiu
Materials. 2022; 15(9): 3028
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of canal centering using Protaper Gold, XP Endoshaper, and Edgefile X7
TusharKanti Majumdar, Minakshi Chowdhury, Sayantan Mukherjee, Paromita Mazumdar
Endodontology. 2022; 34(2): 121
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
5 Evaluation du Respect de la Trajectoire Canalaire par le Système ProTaper®universal : Etude Radiographique Rétrospective
Salma El Abbassi, Sanaa Chala , Majid Sakout , Faïza Abdallaoui
Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022; 9
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
6 Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals after Instrumentation with Different Filing Systems: An In Vitro Study
Gunjan Yadav, Abhay Mani Tripathi, Sonali Saha, Kavita Dhinsa, Priyanka Singh
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022; 15(S1): S22
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
7 Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficiency and Apical Extrusion of Debris Using Two Pediatric Rotary Endodontic Files: An In Vitro Study
Nilima Thosar, Sudhindra Baliga, Faraz Ahmed, Nilesh Rathi, Shreyans A Jain, Jayati Mehta
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 14(2): 196
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
8 A comparison of root canal transportation and centering ability between WaveOne® Gold and Protaper Next® files, using microcomputed tomography
Abdulrzag Gajoum, Ebrahim Patel, Ismail E Munshi, Saidah Tootla
South African Dental Journal. 2021; 76(1): 22
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
9 Comparing the amount of removed dentin thickness in root canal treated primary molar teeth using different instrumentation techniques: in-vitro study using CBCT
Y. Ghahramani, N. Mohammadi, M. Zangooei-Booshehri, S. Shirdel
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2021;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
10 Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5
NikitaArun Kamat, Saritha Vallabhaneni, Prahlad Saraf, Laxmikant Kamatagi, Shrishail Totad
Endodontology. 2021; 33(1): 30
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
11 Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Three Thermally Treated Nickel–Titanium Endodontic Instruments on Standardized 3D-printed Dental Replicas Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Laura Orel, Oana-Alexandra Velea-Barta, Luminita-Maria Nica, Andreea-Simona Boscornea-Pu?cu, Razvan Mihai Horhat, Roxana-Maria Talpos-Niculescu, Cosmin Sinescu, Virgil-Florin Duma, Dan-Dumitru Vulcanescu, Florin Topala, Meda-Lavinia Negrutiu
Medicina. 2021; 57(9): 901
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
12 Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study
Maryam Kuzekanani, Faranak Sadeghi, Nima Hatami, Maryam Rad, Mansoureh Darijani, Laurence James Walsh, Sivakumar Nuvvula
International Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 2021: 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
13 Comparison of two pediatric rotary file systems and hand instrumentation in primary molar: An ex vivo cone-beam computed tomographic study
AS Waly, I Yamany, HM Abbas, MA A Alsairafi, RM F Bazzaz, DF Bogari, TY Alhazzazi
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021; 24(10): 1492
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
14 Creation of well-balanced experimental groups for comparative endodontic laboratory studies: a new proposal based on micro-CT and in silico methods
G. De-Deus, M. Simões-Carvalho, F. G. Belladonna, M. A. Versiani, E. J. N. L. Silva, D. M. Cavalcante, E. M. Souza, G. F. Johnsen, H. J. Haugen, S. Paciornik
International Endodontic Journal. 2020; 53(7): 974
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
15 Microcomputed Assessment of Transportation, Centering Ratio, Canal Area, and Volume Increase after Single-file Rotary and Reciprocating Glide Path Instrumentation in Curved Root Canals: A Laboratory Study
Zeliha Ugur Aydin, Neslihan Büsra Keskin, Taha Özyürek, Ferhat Geneci, Mert Ocak, Hakan Hamdi Çelik
Journal of Endodontics. 2019; 45(6): 791
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
16 Comparison of Centering Ability of Three Different Endodontic Instruments Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study
Ramya Shenoy, Suprabha B Srikrishna, Karuna Y Mahabala, Arathi Rao, Vignesh Palanisamy
World Journal of Dentistry. 2019; 10(4): 306
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
17 Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Rotary I-Race and BT-Race Systems using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An in vitro Study
Asok Mathew, Zahraa M Ali, Ghaya Y Almadhani, Ahmed Al Radeideh, Ahmed J Taleb
World Journal of Dentistry. 2018; 9(4): 297
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
18 Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems
Seyed Mohsen Hasheminia, Alireza Farhad, Mahnaz Sheikhi, Parisa Soltani, Seyedeh Sareh Hendi, Masoumeh Ahmadi
Journal of Endodontics. 2018; 44(12): 1788
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
19 Comparison of root canal apical transportation associated with Wave One, ProTaper Next, TF, and OneShape nickel–titanium instruments in curved canals of extracted teeth: A radiographic evaluation
Mothanna Alrahabi, Ayman Alkady
The Saudi Journal for Dental Research. 2017; 8(1-2): 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
20 Comparitive evaluation of canal shaping ability of three nickel titanium instrument systems using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
MuraliMohan Thota, Sudha Kakollu, Malini Duvvuri, RameshBabu Garikapati
Endodontology. 2017; 29(2): 120
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
21 Comparison of Dentinal Defects induced by Hand Files, Multiple, and Single Rotary Files: A Stereomicroscopic Study
Bharat Choudhary, Atul Jain, Kanchan Bhadoria, Nakul Patidar
World Journal of Dentistry. 2017; 8(1): 45
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
22 Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems
Attiguppe R Prabhakar, Chandrashekar Yavagal, Saraswathi V Naik, Kratika Dixit
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016; 9(1): 45
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
23 Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies
So-Yeon Ahn, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Euiseong Kim
Journal of Endodontics. 2016; 42(7): 1009
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]

 

Read this article