| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2023 | Volume
: 26
| Issue : 3 | Page : 316-320 |
|
|
Comparative evaluation of cleaning efficiency of single file NiTi rotary system during root canal treatment procedure - A scanning electron microscope study
Ruchi Vashisht1, Umesh Kumar1, Swaty Jhamb2, Ruchi Singla2
1 Department of Oral Health Science Centre, Unit of Conservative and Endodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Panjab University, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ruchi Vashisht
House Number 1101, Sector 21B, Chandigarh - 160 022
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_52_23
|
|
|
Background: Optimal biomechanical preparation, thorough irrigation, proper disinfection, and finally, well-sealed obturation is a must to attain definitive success in root canal procedure. Proper preparation of the root canal is all the more imperative to establish a hermetic apical seal with adequately placed filling materials. The present study was conducted for comparing the Cleaning Efficiency of F360 system and the WaveOne Gold (WOG) system of rotary NiTi instrumentation for a root canal.
Materials and Methods: One hundred freshly extracted noncarious mandibular canines were obtained. Access cavity of standard size was made followed by the establishment of working length. Afterward, random division of all the specimens was done into two study groups: group A: the group in which F360 system was used for instrumentation and group B: the group in which the WOG system was used for instrumentation. Irrigations of all the specimens of both the study groups were done followed by root canal shaping by the instrument system of their respective study groups. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for assessment after specimens were cut buccolingually. Debris score and residual smear layer score were used for assessment.
Results: Among group A specimens, the mean smear layer score at the coronal third, middle third, and apical third was 1.76, 2.39, and 2.65, respectively. Among group B specimens, the mean smear layer score at the coronal third, middle third, and apical third was 1.34, 1.59, and 1.92, respectively. While analyzing statistically, it was seen that the mean smear layer score was significantly higher among specimens of group A in comparison to group B. While analyzing statistically, it was seen that the mean debris score was significantly higher among specimens of group A in comparison to group B.
Conclusion: The cleaning effectiveness of WOG instruments was significantly enhanced in comparison to F360 equipment.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
