Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 7146
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 

 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2023  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 299-304
An in vitro comparison of alterations in surface topographies of three different rotary files after root canal preparation with different irrigating solutions: Atomic force microscopic study


Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Sai Dental College and Research Institute, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission28-Jan-2023
Date of Decision27-Feb-2023
Date of Acceptance06-Mar-2023
Date of Web Publication16-May-2023
 

   Abstract 

Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the surface topographies of WaveOne Gold (WOG), FlexiCON X1, and EdgeOne Fire (EOF) reciprocating files before and after root canal instrumentation using different irrigating solutions.
Materials and Methods: Forty-eight extracted mandibular molars were selected and randomly assigned into three groups (n = 16) based on the file system used and each group was divided into two subgroups based on the irrigants used during root canal treatment. (Group-1: WOG; Group-2: FlexiCON X1; Group-3: EOF; Subgroup-A: 3% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl] +17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]; Subgroup-B: Citra wash as irrigating solutions). The surface topography of the files was analyzed using atomic force microscope before and after instrumentation. Average roughness and root mean square roughness were calculated. Independent and paired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc were used for statistical analysis.
Results: Atomic force microscopy results showed an increase in surface roughness after instrumentation, EOF showing the highest roughness. Citra wash showed more roughness compared to NaOCl and EDTA together. However, the surface roughness between the experimental groups WOG and EOF are statistically insignificant and this insignificance was also seen among subgroups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Instrumentation with various irrigating solutions affected the surface topography of EOF, WOG, and FlexiCON X1 reciprocating files.

Keywords: Atomic force microscopy; citra wash; EdgeOne fire

How to cite this article:
Parepalli PS, G. Raju T B, Prasad P K, Dondapati GD, Kintada VS, Mediboyina A. An in vitro comparison of alterations in surface topographies of three different rotary files after root canal preparation with different irrigating solutions: Atomic force microscopic study. J Conserv Dent 2023;26:299-304

How to cite this URL:
Parepalli PS, G. Raju T B, Prasad P K, Dondapati GD, Kintada VS, Mediboyina A. An in vitro comparison of alterations in surface topographies of three different rotary files after root canal preparation with different irrigating solutions: Atomic force microscopic study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 6];26:299-304. Available from: https://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2023/26/3/299/376918

   Introduction Top


One of the most important steps that form the foundation of a successful root canal treatment is cleaning and shaping. Despite having superior properties, nickel–titanium (NiTi) files are also being separated in the root canals without any prior signs of permanent deformation, thereby reducing the success rate of root canal treatment.[1]

NiTi files with different heat treatments and cross-sectional designs have been introduced to increase the fracture resistance during clinical use. Several NiTi files have been introduced with reciprocating motion, as they show lesser amount of surface deformation or irregularities of the files, thereby increasing their fracture resistance and life span.[2]

WaveOne Gold (WOG) (Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland) is a gold-treated single-file system with a parallelogram cross-section and an off-center design, manufactured using several heating–annealing cycles in the gold alloy after milling.[3] Available in four different sizes; as small - #20, primary - #25, medium - #35, and large - #45 with variable tapers. EdgeOne Fire (EOF) (EdgeEndo, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA) files have a similar cross section to WOG and are manufactured using an annealed heat-treated NiTi alloy, brand named FireWire™, which offers high flexibility. These are available in four different sizes; as small - #20, primary - #25, medium - #35, and large - #45, with variable tapers.[4] FlexiCON X1 files (EdgeEndo, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA) are now available as Edge files X1 files.[5] These files are also manufactured using FireWire™ NiTi alloy, with a parabolic cross section. According to the manufacturer, these files yield a better performance in terms of durability and incredible flexibility. These files are available in three sizes 20, 25, and 40.

Among the major concerns with the clinical use of NiTi rotary instruments is the potential for unexpected fracture during root canal preparation, even in the absence of any previously visible defects or deformations on the instrument surface. Several factors, such as manufacturing process, alloys used, fatigue of the files, root canal preparation with different irrigants, cause wear and deform the files, altering the surface topography of NiTi files, and leading to the decrease in fracture resistance.[6] Hence, it is essential to have knowledge of the surface topography of the endodontic files before and after their clinical use, as the defects and irregularities on the files surface caused during canal preparation may result in instrument failure on prolonged use.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has become a popular and documented technique for imaging three-dimensional surfaces and interfaces of a wide variety of materials.[7] Unlike scanning electron microscopy (SEM), AFM analyzes materials both qualitatively and quantitatively. AFM has several advantages over SEM, it works equally well on conducting and insulating surfaces and may be employed under ambient conditions in air, liquid, and in vacuum. In SEM, fragile samples are damaged by harsh sample preparation techniques such as sputtering, dehydration, and exposure to vacuum. Artifacts associated with such techniques can be avoided while using AFM.

To date, no studies have compared the surface topographies of WOG, FlexiCON X1, and EOF files. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and Citra wash (20% citric acid) irrigating solutions on the surface topographies of three different reciprocating file systems using AFM. In particular, average roughness (Ra) and root mean square (RMS) values of instrument surfaces were analyzed.


   Materials and Methods Top


All the sample size was calculated based on the formula given below:

n = r + 1/r (standard deviation [SD]) 2 (Z beta + Z alpha/2) 2/(mean difference) 2.

Forty-eight freshly extracted mandibular molars with mesial canals having an apical curvature of 0°–20° by the Schneider method were included in this study and stored in 0.9% saline until further use.[8] Conventional access cavities were prepared, and working length was determined using 15-size K-files. All samples were embedded in self-cure acrylic resin and randomly assigned into three groups (n = 16) based on the reciprocating file system used. Each group was divided into two subgroups based on the irrigants used during root canal preparation.

  • Group 1: WOG files
  • Group 2: FlexiCON X1 files
  • Group 3: EOF file.
  • Subgroup A: 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA as irrigating solutions
  • Subgroup B: Citra wash (20% citric acid) as irrigating solution.


Samples in each group (n = 16) were prepared using four primary-sized (size #25) files of the respective file system assigned to each group (1 file = 4 mesiobuccal canals). Samples were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions using X-SMART plus endo motor (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland). In half of the samples from each group, canals were irrigated with 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA using a 30 gauge side-vented irrigation needle (RC-Twents; Prime) and in the remaining samples, canals were irrigated with 20% citric acid (Citra wash; Prime). All samples were finally irrigated using 5 ml of 0.9% saline.

Before and after the root canal instrumentation, files were ultrasonically cleaned for 3 min. Surface topography of four primary size files from each file system was analyzed, at 3 mm from the tip of the file, using an Atomic force microscope (A–100, A. P. E. Research, Italy). Ra and RMS values of the files were recorded before and after the instrumentation and the obtained data was processed using Gwyddion software version 2.61 [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: AFM images of three reciprocating files before instrumentation in 10 μm × 10 μm. (a) WaveOne Gold, (b) FlexiCON X1, (c) EdgeOne Fire (μm = micrometers)

Click here to view
Figure 2: AFM images after instrumentation using different irrigants. (a) WaveOne Gold with NaOCl and EDTA, (b) WaveOne Gold with Citrawash, (c) FlexiCON X1 with NaOCl and EDTA, (d) FlexiCON X1 with Citrawash, (e) EdgeOne Fire with NaOCl and EDTA (f) EdgeOne Fire with Citrawash

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20 software (IBM SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) at a significance level of 5%. Independent t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc, and paired t-tests were done to analyze the data.


   Results Top


The means and SD of Ra and RMS values were shown in [Table 1] and [Table 2] and depicted in [Graph 1] and [Graph 2], respectively.
Table 1: Comparison of pre- and postinstrumentation average roughness within each group based on the irrigant used

Click here to view
Table 2: Comparison of pre- and postinstrumentation root mean square roughness within each group based on the irrigant used paired t-test; P=0.05 considered statistically significant

Click here to view



  • All the three file systems showed an increase in the surface roughness after instrumentation. EOF showed the highest, FlexiCON X1 files showed the least amount of surface roughness among all experimental groups both before and after the instrumentation. Citra wash showed more roughness compared to NaOCl and EDTA together. However, the surface roughness between the experimental groups WOG and EOF are statistically insignificant and this insignificance was also seen among subgroups (P>0.05).
  • Before and after root canal treatment, one-way ANOVA with post hoc analysis for multiple pairwise comparisons, there were significant differences between all possible pairs except between WaveOne Gold and EdgeOne Fire
  • Independent Student's t-test was used for comparison of preinstrumentation and post instrumentation study parameters, respectively, within each group based on the irrigant used and no significant differences were observed.



   Discussion Top


The visual inspection of NiTi files is not considered a reliable method for assessing used files since NiTi rotary files may fracture during clinic use, within the elastic limits, without any prior sign of permanent deformation. During cleaning and shaping, NiTi files give up their surface contents and wear upon usage due to mechanical friction between file and dentin and due to irrigants used during preparation cause surface defects such as scratches and microcracks, leading to file separation.[9] Various defects seen are pitting, metal flash, and grinding marks which act as stress concentration points, reducing the fracture resistance.[10] Assessing the change in the surface topography of files during instrumentation is important and tells a lot about the instrument safety during the clinical use of the files.

In the present study, extracted mandibular molars, with mild-to-moderate apical curvatures, were selected to better represent common clinical conditions. Previous studies had used artificial canals made of acrylic, which minimizes the variations among samples, but they do not match the hardness values of natural teeth.[11],[12] It has also been reported that the heat generated during canal preparation melts the acrylic and gets accumulated in the flutes of the files.[13]

The manufacturer recommends the files to be used only once. Using only once does not mean that usage of file for a single canal; a single use file can be used in a molar tooth with 3-4 canals.[14] In the present study, four mesiobuccal canals of four different mandibular molars were instrumented using each test file. A single operator prepared all the canals to eliminate the interoperator variable.

According to the results obtained, no statistical difference was found in the surface porosity between unused WOG and EOF files. The difference in Ra and RMS values of unused files is due to their different manufacturing and finishing processes.

WOG files are manufactured using thermomechanically heat-treated NiTi gold wire which is subjected to the proprietary postmachining heat processes after being ground by machine.[15] FlexiCON X1 and EOF files are manufactured using an annealed, heat-treated, cryogenically tempered NiTi alloy known as FireWire™.[16] In this study, FlexiCON X1 group had showed the least amount of surface roughness, because of the electropolishing process done additionally during manufacturing of FlexiCON X1 files. FireWire™ alloy also povides more torsional resistance to the instruments than the Gold Wire alloy (Bhandi S et al.). [17],[18]

After the preparation, used files showed increase in surface roughness. The results of the current study are in line with the findings of AlRahabi and Atta and Zafar as both studies reported an increase in the surface roughness values following endodontic instrumentation.[14],[19]

The increase in surface porosity observed in all the three groups of files after use suggests that the files deteriorate with clinical use. Files with higher surface roughness are more prone to surface deterioration and initiate crack formation, which can lead to file breakage.[20] Pereira et al. observed similar findings in different new NiTi files and found the presence of marks left by the machining process during manufacturing and the propagation of transverse cracks 3 mm from the tip after clinical use.[21]

Increase in surface roughness of WOG files after instrumentation was in line with a previous study done by Bhatia et al.[22] This may be due to the formation of a less passive surface layer on the WOG as compared to Twisted File Adaptive (TFA) and XP EndoShaper (XPS) systems.

The higher amount of surface roughness of EOF and WOG files, when compared to FlexiCON X1, might be due to their use as a single file system in the canal and their greater taper in the apical region. In contrast, FlexiCON X1 file system is not a single file system requiring the usage of multi[le files with a constant taper of 6%. This features reduces the friction between files and radicular dentin, thereby reducing the surface roughness.

The cross section of an instrument also plays an important role in the deterioration of surface characteristics and other features of the file. In the present study, higher amount of surface roughness in EOF and WOG files might be due to their parallelogram cross section, which contributes to the bulk of the instrument when compared to parabolic cross section of FlexiCON X1 files.

Based on AFM results, files instrumented using Citra wash as an irrigant showed higher surface roughness values, compared to those instrumented with NaOCl + EDTA as irrigating solutions.

Ametrano et al. evaluated the surface topographic changes of ProTaper instruments immersed in 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA solution for 5 min and 10 min using AFM and concluded that the samples immersed for a longer duration of time showed greater increase in roughness.[23] They also showed that EDTA caused more amount of roughness than NaOCl. The results of the present study are in accordance with other studies, which reported that NaOCl and EDTA were associated with deterioration of the file surface, as a result of a chemical reaction creating surface roughness.[24]

Increased surface roughness in the Citra wash subgroup, might be due to its low pH of 2.80. Eldeniz et al. evaluated the effect of EDTA and citric acid solutions on root dentin roughness.[25] When compared with EDTA, citric acid showed the increased surface roughness of root dentin because of the low pH of citric acid. This might be the reason for the increased surface roughness of files in the present study. Insignificant difference in results between the two irrigant subgroups was because of the short-term action of the irrigant on the NiTi files, which is not sufficient to trigger cracks and cause superficial changes.

This is the first and foremost study to be conducted on the Citra wash and to evaluate the surface roughness of FlexiCON X1 and EOF files using AFM. Additional studies are required to test the effect of Citra wash on the surface roughness, corrosion, and other physical properties of NiTi files and also to determine its effectiveness as an irrigating solution. Further, evaluation of surface topographies of investigated files in different clinical conditions, with a larger sample size, is required.


   Conclusion Top


Within the limitations of the present study:

  • All the three file systems showed an increase in the surface roughness after instrumentation
  • After the root canal instrumentation, EOF files have shown the highest amount of surface roughness, followed by WOG and the least in FlexiCON X1 files
  • Citra wash irrigant has been shown to induce more amount of surface roughness compared to NaOCl and EDTA, although no significant differences were found among them.


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Subha N, Sikri VK. Comparative evaluation of surface changes in four Ni-Ti instruments with successive uses – An SEM study. J Conserv Dent 2011;14:282-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Mathew PA, Nair RS, Christaine Angelo JM, Mathai V, Vineet RV, Christopher SR. A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2019;22:554-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
  [Full text]  
3.
Bhatia S, Nagendrababu V, Peters OA, Fawzy A, Daood U. Author correction: Evaluation of usage-induced degradation of different endodontic file systems. Sci Rep 2021;11:16015.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gambarini G, Galli M, Di Nardo D, Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, Testarelli L. Differences in cyclic fatigue lifespan between two different heat treated NiTi endodontic rotary instruments: WaveOne Gold versus EdgeOne Fire. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e609-13.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sowjanya T, Parvathaneni KP, Raju T, Varma NM, Dondapati GD, Podili S. Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2022;25:269-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
  [Full text]  
6.
Yamazaki-Arasaki A, Cabrales R, Santos MD, Kleine B, Prokopowitsch I. Topography of four different endodontic rotary systems, before and after being used for the 12th time. Microsc Res Tech 2012;75:97-102.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Siedlecki CA, Marchant RE. Atomic force microscopy for characterization of the biomaterial interface. Biomaterials 1998;19:441-54.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Zhou Z, Zheng J. Tribology of dental materials: A review. J Phys D Appl Phys 2008;41:113001.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hoert C, Peters O, Barbakow F. Wear of nickel–titanium light speed instruments evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. J Endod 1999;25:494-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fatma Y, Ozgur U. Evaluation of surface topography changes in three NiTi file systems using rotary and reciprocal motion: An atomic force microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech 2014;77:177-82.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K. Effect of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA on surface roughness of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM Files. Microsc Res Tech 2018;81:1406-11.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Msd, Seung-Jong L, et al. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 2000;26:719-23.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
AlRahabi AM, Atta RM. Surface nanoscale profile of WaveOne, WaveOne Gold, Reciproc, and Reciproc blue, before and after root canal preparation. Odontology 2019;107:500-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys – A review. Int Endod J 2018;51:1088-103.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Khalil WA, Natto ZS. Cyclic fatigue, bending resistance, and surface roughness of ProTaper Gold and EdgeEvolve files in canals with single- and double-curvature. Restor Dent Endod 2019;44:e19.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Khalil WA, Merdad K, Abu-Haimed TS, Howait M, Alsofi L. Cyclic fatigue resistance of protaper gold, Edgefile, oneshape and ProTaper universal. Egypt Dent J 2018;64:589-96.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bhandi S, Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, Reda R, Mazzoni A, Nottola S, et al. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments: An in vitro comparison (torsional resistance of two heat-treated reciprocating files). J Contemp Dent Pract 2021;22:361-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Zafar MS. Impact of endodontic instrumentation on surface roughness of various nickel-titanium rotary files. Eur J Dent 2021;15:273-80.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Nusstein JM, Daehn GS. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. J Endod 2005;31:40-3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Pereira ES, Gomes RO, Leroy AM, Singh R, Peters OA, Bahia MG, et al. Mechanical behavior of M-Wire and conventional NiTi wire used to manufacture rotary endodontic instruments. Dent Mater 2013;29:e318-24.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bhatia S, Nagendrababu V, Peters OA, Fawzy A, Daood U. Evaluation of usage-induced degradation of different endodontic file systems. Sci Rep 2021;11:9027.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ametrano G, D'Antò V, Di Caprio MP, Simeone M, Rengo S, Spagnuolo G. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on rotary nickel-titanium instruments evaluated using atomic force microscopy. Int Endod J 2011;44:203-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sonntag D, Peters OA. Effect of prion decontamination protocols on nickel-titanium rotary surfaces. J Endod 2007;33:442-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Eldeniz AU, Erdemir A, Belli S. Effect of EDTA and citric acid solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of human root canal dentin. J Endod 2005;31:107-10.  Back to cited text no. 25
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Prem Sai Parepalli
59A-4-13B, New P and T Colony, Vijayawada - 520 008, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_72_23

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1275    
    Printed138    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded46    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal