| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2023 | Volume
: 26
| Issue : 3 | Page : 288-291 |
|
|
Comparison of single and multiple file rotary endodontic instruments for debris and irrigant extrusion: An in vitro study
Deepika Mehra, Dakshita Joy Sinha, Sarita Singh, Neha Verma, Priyanka Rani, Beenish Parvez
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Dakshita Joy Sinha
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad - 201 010, Uttar Pradesh
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_62_23
|
|
|
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the quantity of apically debris which was extruded apically by TruNatomy (TN), ProTaper Next (PTN), HyFlex electric discharge machining (EDM), and HyFlex controlled memory (CM), following root canal preparation.
Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted single-canal mandibular premolars were used. The root canal preparation was done with TN, HyFlex EDM, PTN, or HyFlex CM files. The preweight debris, which was extruded apically, was collected in the Eppendorf tube and later on incubated at 670°C for 3 days and weighed again to record the extruded debris.
Results: The result showed that there was a significant reduction in debris extrusion by TN system, followed by PTN system, HyFlex EDM, and maximum extrusion in HyFlex CM (P < 0.05). Between the PTN and TN groups as well as between the HyFlex EDM and HyFlex CM groups, statistically significant difference was not observed (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Apical debris extrusion is the inherent nature of the all file systems. Nevertheless, the TN file system produced substantially minimum debris extrusion among other systems compared in the study.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
