Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 2061
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2023  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 104-107
Evaluation of detrimental effects of impacted Mandibular third molars on adjacent second molars – A retrospective observational study


Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, HKES's S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission09-Jun-2022
Date of Decision06-Oct-2022
Date of Acceptance13-Oct-2022
Date of Web Publication08-Dec-2022
 

   Abstract 

Context: Mandibular impacted third molars are the most frequently impacted teeth in humans and can predispose the adjacent second molar to an array of detrimental effects such as caries, periodontitis, and cervical resorption thus the aim of this study was to determine the same.
Subjects and Methods: A retrospective observational cross-sectional study involving patients with orthopantomography presenting with impacted lower third molar. The type, depth, and level of impaction, the extent of caries, periodontal changes, and the presence of cervical resorption were assessed.
Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0. with Chi-square.
Results: Mesioangular impaction was most commonly noted. The pattern of impaction had a direct influence in the formation of carious lesions, cervical resorption, and periodontal ligament (PDL) changes.
Conclusions: Noting the pattern of third molar impaction helps the clinician to forecast problems that may occur on adjacent teeth and initiate necessary prophylactic treatment.

Keywords: Cervical resorption; distal caries; impacted lower third molars; PDL changes

How to cite this article:
Belam A, Rairam SG, Patil V, Ratnakar P, Patil S, Kulkarni S. Evaluation of detrimental effects of impacted Mandibular third molars on adjacent second molars – A retrospective observational study. J Conserv Dent 2023;26:104-7

How to cite this URL:
Belam A, Rairam SG, Patil V, Ratnakar P, Patil S, Kulkarni S. Evaluation of detrimental effects of impacted Mandibular third molars on adjacent second molars – A retrospective observational study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 5];26:104-7. Available from: https://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2023/26/1/104/362913

   Introduction Top


An impacted tooth is one that fails to erupt into the dental arch within the expected time. The tooth becomes impacted because of adjacent teeth, dense overlying bone or excessive soft tissue prevents eruption.[1] Wisdom teeth may emerge in a nonfunctional or only partly functional position and can affect any tooth, but the impaction rate is much more frequent in mandibular third molars (66%–77%) than in maxillary third molars (40%–60%). The prevalence is influenced by age, gender, ethnicity, and skeletal face type.[2]

Unerupted lower third molar has been associated with various symptoms and pathologies, such as pericoronitis, pain, swelling, cheek ulcerations, odontogenic cysts, benign or malignant tumors, and systemic infections.[3] Impacted third molars can predispose the adjacent second molar to an array of detrimental effects such as pain, swelling, pericoronitis, caries, periodontitis, and resorption.[4]

Therefore, it is essential to detect high-risk patients to establish a strict follow-up protocol allowing for an early diagnosis of pathologies. Thus, the study aimed to evaluate the detrimental effects of impacted lower third molars on the status of second molars. The objective of our study was to investigate whether second molars adjacent to impacted third molars exhibit a greater risk of loss due to dental caries, cervical resorption, or periodontal changes. Further, it also evaluates various other aspects of impaction such as its angulation, depth, level, and the degree of causing the above effects on adjacent teeth. The null hypothesis for the study was that there would be no detrimental effects on second molars due to impacted lower third molars.


   Subjects and Methods Top


A cross-sectional retrospective observational study was carried out after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethical committee board. A total of 400 orthopantomography (OPG) radiographs were collected, out of which 205 OPGs satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected, constituting a total of 379 impacted mandibular third molars.

Inclusion criteria

  1. OPGs of male and female adult patients having erupted/partially impacted or fully impacted lower third molar with the presence of adjacent second molar
  2. Age ranging between 18 and 60 years.


Exclusion criteria

  1. OPG of traumatic injuries or fractures
  2. No proper clarity/hazy images and benign and malignant cysts tumors.


Methodology: After data collection, the impacted third molars were classified using Winter's classification[5] for angulation, depth of impaction, and space available for eruption distal to the second molar.

Based on the inclination of the long axis of the impacted third molar to the long axis of the second molar, the tooth was classified as mesioangular, distoangular, horizontal, and vertical.

The depth of the impacted third molar was evaluated as:

Level A, if the occlusal line of the third molar is in line with or above the occlusal line of the second molar, Level B, if it is below the occlusal line and above the cervical line of the second molar, and Level C, if the third molar is below the cervical line of the second molar.[6]

Depending upon the space available, it was divided as[7]

Class 1: Sufficient space available for eruption,

Class 2: Space is less than the mesiodistal width of the third molar, and

Class 3: If the tooth is completely embedded in the bone.

The effect of impacted/partially erupted and fully erupted the third molar on adjacent teeth for the presence of caries, cervical resorption, or any PDL changes seen with the adjacent second molar was assessed by two investigators.

Healthy second molars with no such pathologies were also recorded as a part of the study. Cervical resorption of the second molar was recorded by viewing the contact point of the third molar to the second molar whether the attachment is with a crown (occlusal, middle, or apical), root (cervical, middle, or apical), or below the apex. Periodontal status was considered compromised if widening, thinning/thickening, or loss of sharp border of lamina dura, horizontal, or vertical bone loss, involvement of furcation was seen with the second molar and normal if any such findings were not seen.


   Results Top


Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21, IBM Inc. Armonk, NY. The Chi-square test was used for the comparison of categorical data among groups. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.


   Discussion Top


Impacted third molars can predispose the adjacent second molar to an array of detrimental effects such as caries, periodontitis, and cervical resorption. This may lead to loss of hard tissue, pain, discomfort to the patient, and ultimately loss of the tooth.[8]

Mesioangular impaction was the most prevalent type of impaction encountered[9],[10],[11] [Table 1]. Most authors state that a mesioangular tilt is highly associated with the occurrence of pathology, while vertical, distoangular, or ectopic impactions are unlikely to result in the above pathologies.[12]
Table 1: Effect of angulation, level of impaction, and space available for the eruption of mandibular third molar on the occurrence of caries, resorption, and PDL status of adjacent second molar

Click here to view


Most of the third molars were impacted in line with the occlusal line of the second molar, i.e., Level A (71.80%). The percentage of impacted third molar Level B (10%) and Level C (15.80%) of second molars was less comparable.

Most of the lower third molars belonged to class 1, i.e., 64.10%, 9.00% of them were class 2 whereas 25.9% were class 3.

Among all the pathologies, the prevalence of dental caries is the highest seen[13],[14],[15] in the literature which was in accordance with the study as it showed 16.1% involvement, followed by periodontal involvement (13.2%) and cervical resorption (12.7%) [Table 2]. Mesioangular and horizontal third molars are more likely to be associated with caries development in the adjacent second molars and cause resorption of the adjacent molar.[16] However, fully erupted molars might also be an important risk factor to cause caries (16.9%).
Table 2: Effect of the contact point of impacted lower third molar on second molar

Click here to view


The influence of the contact point located between the second and third molars on the formation of distal caries on the second molar has been well documented.[17],[18] Third molar contacting the adjacent molar in the middle of the crown (23.1%) showed a higher caries rate than other contact points probably due to difficulty in cleaning leading to higher plaque accumulation and subsequent caries.

The literature suggests a unique pattern of distal caries. Carious lesion present at and below DEJ is termed as distal cervical caries usually seen when the mesial cusp of a partially erupted mesioangular impacted third molar contacts the second molar.[19] Radiographically, it appears as a notch on the enamel surface near the contact point.

Mandibular third molar in mesioangular and horizontal impactions have been reported to cause resorption of the adjacent teeth[20] and this was also observed in the present study. All the second molars that had cervical resorption had direct tooth-to-tooth contact with the impacted third molar while most of the second molars with distal caries did not have tooth-to-tooth contact. This suggests that resorption may be due to possible eruptive movements of the third molar as seen in succedaneous teeth resorption during their normal eruption sequence.

Impacted third molars showed a higher prevalence of PDL involvement than erupted third molars.

Studies suggest that a visible third molar itself might be a risk factor for an anaerobic environment conducive to periodontal disease.[21] However, in our study, the strongest association was found in mesioangular (21.2%), followed by horizontally impacted third molars (16.1%).

The International Caries Detection and Assessment System has presented a new paradigm for the measurement of dental caries, which was developed from the systematic reviews of the literature on the clinical caries detection system and other sources and it could be of great use in the detection of such cases.[22],[23]

Further studies in this direction can be carried out using CBCT which helps in better detection and assessment of three-dimensional pathologies.


   Conclusions Top


Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that mesioangularly impacted third molar is the most commonly found impaction and is associated with most of the pathologies on adjacent second molar. However, fully erupted third molar or any other kind of impactions also cause pathologies on adjacent teeth. Hence, one can consider prophylactic extraction of the impacted third molar, if detected in the early stages.

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge the help from Dr. Arvind Moldi Principal, HKES S N Dental College, Kalaburagi Dr. Pallavi Deshmukh Head of Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, HKES S N Dental College, Kalaburagi, and Dr. Prashant Kumar, Reader, Department of Oral Pathology, HKES S N Dental College, Kalaburagi, for helping us in data collection (OPGs of patients).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen PE, Waite PD, Of PS. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. BC Decker, Ontario. 2004.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sivaramakrishnan SM, Ramani P. Study on the prevalence of eruption status of third molars in South Indian population. Biol Med 2015;7:1.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Akarslan ZZ, Kocabay C. Assessment of the associated symptoms, pathologies, positions and angulations of bilateral occurring mandibular third molars: Is there any similarity? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e26-32.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Stanley HR, Alattar M, Collett WK, Stringfellow HR Jr., Spiegel EH. Pathological sequelae of “neglected” impacted third molars. J Oral Pathol 1988;17:113-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Winter GB. The Principles of Exodontia as Applied to the Impacted Third Molar. St. Louis, MO: American Medical Book Co.; 1926.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pell G, Gregory B. Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Dig 1993;39:330-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pedersen G. Surgical removal of teeth. In: Oral Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Passi D, Singh G, Dutta S, Srivastava D, Chandra L, Mishra S, et al. Study of pattern and prevalence of mandibular impacted third molar among Delhi-National Capital Region population with newer proposed classification of mandibular impacted third molar: A retrospective study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2019;10:59-67.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Ma Y, Mu D, Li X. Risk factors for root resorption of second molars with impacted third molars: A meta analysis of CBCT studies. Acta Odontol Scand 2022; 80:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Waseem N, Asim MA, Maqsood A, Ghafoor MW, Khalid MO. Evaluation of patterns of impacted third molars and their association with vital structures by radiographic examination. PAFMJ 2021;71:255-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ye ZX, Qian WH, Wu YB, Yang C. Pathologies associated with the mandibular third molar impaction. Sci Prog 2021;104:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Marques J, Montserrat-Bosch M, Figueiredo R, Vilchez-Pérez MA, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Gay-Escoda C. Impacted lower third molars and distal caries in the mandibular second molar. Is prophylactic removal of lower third molars justified? J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e794-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kunwar D, Koirala U, Manandhar A, Subedi S, Gurung N. Association of prevalence of dental caries in mandibular second molar with impacted third molar. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2021;19:259-63.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Prasanna Kumar D, Sharma M, Vijaya Lakshmi G, Subedar RS, Nithin VM, Patil V. Pathologies Associated with Second Mandibular Molar Due to Various Types of Impacted Third Molar: A Comparative Clinical Study. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2021 Feb 23:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Vinayahalingam S, Kempers S, Limon L, Deibel D, Maal T, Hanisch M, et al. Classification of caries in third molars on panoramic radiographs using deep learning. Sci Rep 2021;11:12609.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yıldırım H, Büyükgöze-Dindar M. Investigation of the prevalence of impacted third molars and the effects of eruption level and angulation on caries development by panoramic radiographs. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2022;27:e106-12.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Le SH, Nguyen NM, Nguyen NT, Nguyen LT. Anatomical positions of Mesially/Horizontally impacted mandibular third molars are significant predictors for distal caries in adjacent second molars. Int J Dent 2022;2022:8482209.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Akkitap MP, Gümrü B. Impacted third molar: To extract or not to extract, that is the question. Dent Med J Rev 2021;3:66 82.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Iqbal F, Zia K, Sajid R, Khan AN, Rabbani S, Khan NR. Effect of impacted mandibular third molar on development of distal caries of second molars. Pak J Med Health Sci 2022;16:529.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Daware S, Hate C. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: External Root Resorption of the Mandibular Second Molar Associated with Completely Impacted Third Molar: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Clinical Dentistry (0974-3979). 2021 Apr 1;15(4).  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
White RP Jr., Proffit WR. Evaluation and management of asymptomatic third molars: Lack of symptoms does not equate to lack of pathology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:10-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Shivakumar K, Prasad S, Chandu G. International caries detection and assessment system: A new paradigm in detection of dental caries. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:10-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Carounanidy U, Sathyanarayanan R. Dental caries: A complete changeover (Part II)-changeover in the diagnosis and prognosis. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:87-100.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ambika Belam
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, HKES's S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kalaburagi - 585 105, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_341_22

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed266    
    Printed395    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal