| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 24
| Issue : 4 | Page : 379-383 |
|
|
Microhardness and surface roughness of Biodentine exposed to mouthwashes
Mayara Manfrin Arnez1, Raisa Castelo1, David Ugarte2, Leonardo de Padua Andrade Almeida1, Tatiane Cristina Dotta2, Alma Blasida Concepcion Elizaur Benitez Catirse1
1 Department of Materials and Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
2 Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, National University of Concepción, Concepción, Paraguay
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mayara Manfrin Arnez
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Cafe, s/n, Monte Alegre, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo 14040-904
Brazil
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_113_21
|
|
|
Aim: This study evaluates Vickers microhardness and surface roughness in Biodentine cement (M1) and glass-ionomer cement Fuji IX (M2), both immersed in mouthwash.
Materials and Methods: Fifty-four samples were randomly distributed in distilled water (S1), Listerine Cool Mint (S2), and Colgate Plax (S3). Each sample was put in a flask with mouthwash for 2 min, under vibration, twice a day for 21 days. Microhardness and surface roughness were assessed at 48 h (T0), 7 days (T1), 14 days (T2), and 21 days (T3).
Results: For roughness: time (T), solution (S) and material (M), TxM, and SxM and for microhardness: M, TxS, TxM, and SxM were statistically significant. T3, M1, M1T3, and M1S1 presented the highest surface roughness. M2, M1T0, M1T1, M1T2, M1S1, and M1S2 presented higher microhardness.
Conclusion: Biodentine showed higher surface roughness for T1, T2, and T3 and higher microhardness for T0, T1, and T2 against Fuji IX. Biodentine presented higher microhardness independently of solution.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
