| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 24
| Issue : 3 | Page : 278-282 |
|
|
Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
Aarti Mulgaonkar, Ida de Noronha de Ataide, Marina Fernandes, Rajan Lambor
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Aarti Mulgaonkar
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21
|
|
|
Aims: The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the bonding ability of alkasite restorative material to TheraCal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal adhesive and characterizing their failure modes.
Subjects and Methods: Ninety extracted intact human molars were divided into three groups of (n = 30) as Group I (TLC), Group II (RMGIC), and Group III (BD). Each group was subdivided into two based on application of universal adhesive. Cention N was bonded to each sample. Shear bond strength analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 software.
Results: No significant difference was observed between Group I and Group II (P < 0.05) while Group III showed the least bond strength (P < 0.05). The modes of failure were predominantly cohesive in Groups I and III (TLC and BD) while RMGIC showed mixed and adhesive failures.
Conclusions: The bond strength of Cention N to TLC and RMGIC was similar and significantly higher than that of BD following application of universal adhesive.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
