Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 1623
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 336-339

The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press

1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, AMIST University, Kedah, Malaysia
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
3 Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, AMIST University, Kedah, Malaysia
4 Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, AMIST University, Kedah, Malaysia
5 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Mallareddy Dental College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
6 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Leneena Gudugunta
AIMST University, Kedah 08100
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_31_19

Rights and Permissions

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the vertical marginal discrepancy of computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) and pressable lithium disilicate onlays. Materials and Methods: A maxillary first premolar typodont tooth was prepared to receive lithium disilicate onlay. Mesio-occluso-distal cavity was prepared with palatal cusp reduction and collar preparation. In the proximal box, gingival seat was placed 1 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction and mesiodistal width of the seat was kept to 1 mm. Thirty stone models were prepared from thirty rubber base impressions and divided into two groups, based on the technique of fabrication of onlays: (1) Group CL (CAD/CAM lithium disilicate) and (2) Group PL (Pressable lithium disilicate). Fifteen onlays per each group were fabricated by following the manufacturer instructions. Marginal fit of all the samples were analyzed by using stereomicroscope with Image Analysis software.Statistical analysis was done by t-test. Results: Statistical significant difference was found between both the groups. The lowest marginal discrepancy (41.46 μm) was measured for Group CL (CAD/CAM lithium disilicate) specimens, and the highest (55.95 μm) discrepancy was observed on the Group PL (Pressable lithium disilicate) specimens. Conclusion: Although there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, marginal gap of both the groups were in clinically acceptable levels.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded220    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal