Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 2036
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 30-33

Staining potential of acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) foam on dental restorations in vitro

1 Private Practitioner, ABC Dental Group, Sydney, Australia
2 School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville City, Cairns, Australia

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Boyen Huang
James Cook University School of Medicine and Dentistry, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland 4870
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.148886

Rights and Permissions

Objectives: To identify the staining potential of acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) foam on restorations in vitro. Materials and Methods: Two hundred ovine molars were used. Except 40 teeth remained unrestored as the controls, each was randomly selected to receive one of four restorative materials including preparation without restoration, glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), or composite resin (CR). Following the procedure, topical APF was applied with a predetermined frequency. Staining formation was then evaluated. Results: APF-treated teeth and restorations appeared with a darker shade, an orange-colored surface and/or a brown margin. The staining rates on GIC, RMGIC, and CR were 50%, 27.5%, and 17.5%, respectively. GIC had a higher staining potential than RMGIC (χ2 = 4.266, df = 1, P = 0.039) and CR (χ2 = 9.448, df = 1, P = 0.002), whereas the difference between RMGIC and CR was indiscernible (χ2 = 1.147, df = 1, P = 0.284). Repeated applications of topical APF increased the risk of staining on RMGIC (χ2 = 8.436 df = 1, P = 0.004) and CR (χ2 = 6.873, df = 1, P = 0.009) but not on GIC (χ2 = 0, df = 1, P = 1) and the controls (χ2 = 4.051, df = 3, P = 0.256). Conclusions: APF-foam-related staining was confirmed in vitro. GIC was more susceptible to fluoride staining. This study suggested aesthetic implications when applying fluorides to restored teeth.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded239    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal