ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2014 | Volume
: 17
| Issue : 6 | Page : 531-535 |
|
The assessment of surface roughness and microleakage of eroded tooth-colored dental restorative materials
Thulfiqar Ali Hussein1, Wan Zaripah Wan Bakar1, Zuryati Ab Ghani2, Dasmawati Mohamad3
1 Conservative Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia 2 Prosthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia 3 Biomaterial Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
Correspondence Address:
Zuryati Ab Ghani School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan Malaysia
 Source of Support: Financial support given by Universiti
Sains Malaysia through the SHORT TERM GRANT-304/
PPSG/61311041, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.144585
|
|
Objectives: To investigate the effect of acidic solution on surface roughness and microleakage of tooth-colored restorative materials.
Materials and Methods: A 160 box-shaped cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 160 human molars, and assigned to four groups: Group A restored with Ketac™ Molar Easymix, Group B with Fuji II™ LC, Group C with Ketac™N100, and Group D with Filtek™ Z250, and subdivided into study and control groups (n = 20). Study groups were immersed in lemon juice (pH = 2.79) for 24 h, whilst controlgroups in deionized distilled water. All samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye, sectioned into two equal halves for surface roughness, and microleakage tests. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests at P < 0.05.
Results: There was a significant difference in surface roughness of Ketac™ Molar, Fuji II™LC, and Ketac™N100. No significant difference was found in microleakage of Ketac™ Molar and Fuji II™LC; however, there were significant differences in the gingival margin of Ketac™N100, and the occlusal margin of Filtek™Z250.
Conclusions: All glass ionomer cements were eroded after exposure to the acidic drink. Filtek™ Z250 and Ketac™ Molar Easymix showed more microleakage. All materials showed more microleakage at the gingival margins. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|