| |
|
|
| Year : 2013 | Volume
: 16
| Issue : 2 | Page : 99-110 |
|
| Variable permanent mandibular first molar: Review of literature |
|
|
Srinidhi V Ballullaya1, Sayesh Vemuri1, Pabbati Ravi Kumar2
1 Department of Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, St Joseph Dental College, Duggirala, Eluru, West Godavari District, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Geetham Dental College, Vizag, Andhra Pradesh, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
| Date of Submission | 26-Jul-2012 |
| Date of Decision | 15-Aug-2012 |
| Date of Acceptance | 23-Aug-2012 |
| Date of Web Publication | 7-Mar-2013 |
|
|
 |
|
 Abstract | | |
Introduction: The success of root canal therapy depends on the locations of all the canals, thourough debridement and proper sealing. At times the clinicians are challenged with variations in morphology of root canal. This review article attempts to list out all the variations of permanent mandibular first molar published so for in the literature.
Materials and Methods: An exhaustive search was undertaken using PUBMED database to identify published literature from 1900 to 2010 relating to the root canal morphology of permanent first molar by using key words. The selected artcles were obtained and reviewed.
Results: Total ninty seven articles were selected out of which 50 were original article and forty seven were case reports. The incidence of third canal in mesial root was 0.95% to 15%. The incidence of three rooted mandibular first molar was 3% to 33%. Only ninety cases reported with c-shape canal configuration. Incidence of Taurodintism without congenital disorder was very rare.
Conclusion: The root canal treatment requires proper knowlegde of variations in root canal morphology in order to recognise, disinfect and seal all portal of exit. This can be accomplished with proper diagnosis using newer modes, modification in access preparation, use of operating microscope, enhanced methods of disinfecting and sealing of all canals. Keywords: C-shape canal; Middle mesial canal; Permanent mandibular molar; Radix endomolaris; Radix paramolaris; Taurodontism
How to cite this article:
Ballullaya SV, Vemuri S, Kumar PR. Variable permanent mandibular first molar: Review of literature. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:99-110 |
| Introduction | |  |
For root canal treatment to be successful, it is necessary to locate all root canals, debride them thoroughly and seal them completely with an inert root filling material. The clinician should be aware of the internal morphology of permanent teeth and the possible variations which may be encountered. [1] The mandibular first molar is the first posterior tooth that erupts and is the tooth that most often requires root canal treatment. This tooth usually has two roots but occasionally, it has three with two or three canals in the mesial root and one, two, or three canals in the distal root. [2]
The mandibular first molar generally has two separate roots with a round, or more frequently elliptical, canal in the distal root and two canals in the mesial root [Figure 1]. The Distal canal (s) is normally straight all the way to the apex, oval or flattened in cross- section, but quite large which makes instrumentation easy. Often the most apical 1-2 mm of this canal curves up to 90 degrees distally, but this is seldom a clinical problem. | Figure 1: Diagram illustrating the mesial and distal root of mandibular molar
Click here to view |
Regarding mesial root in 90%, they remain separate as far as the foramen; in the remaining 10%, they join together at a common foramen. The canals of the mesial root take a more curved course with a mesial orientation immediately below the orifice and then distal in the rest of the root canal. [3]
Root canal morphology and configuration have been classified by Weine et al, [4] Vertucci [5] and Gulabivala et al,[6] [Figure 2]. | Figure 2: Root canal configuration as described by Weine and Vertucci et al.
Click here to view |
Previous in vitro and in vivo reports have indicated that mandibular molars can have more than three root canals. The permanent mandibular molar have been reported to have three roots, mesial and distal roots with three canal each or molar with 5, 6, or more canals. The purpose of this study was to perform a review of literature related to variations in roots and root canal morphology of permanent mandibular first molar.
| Materials and Methods | | |
An exhaustive search was undertaken to identify published literature related to the root canal morphology and its variation of permanent mandibular first molar. The database was searched via the pubmed search engine http://www.ncbi..nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db = pubmed by using following search criteria: Root canal morphology of mandibular first molar, Middle mesial canal of mandibular first molar, Radix Entomolaris, Radix Paramolaris, C-shape morphology of mandibular first molar, Taurodontism. A similar search was also undertaken in Google, journals, and reference lists. The search included all years up to December 2010. Obtained articles were divided into case reports and study articles which were then allocated to each variation. The abstracts were collected. The relevance of the abstract was studied and accordingly full article were obtained and reviewed.
| Results | | |
[Table 1] and [Table 2] presents case reports and studies of middle mesial canal of mandibular first molar. The incidence of middle mesial canal were approximately 0.95% to 15%. [Table 3] and [Table 4] presents studies and case reports concerning distal root. The incidence of third root (radix entomolaris) was 3% to 33%. | Table 1: Case reports of a third canal in the mesial root of mandibular first mandibular first molar
Click here to view |
 | Table 2: Prevalence of a third canal in the mesial root of mandibular first molars according to different authors
Click here to view |
 | Table 3: Prevalence of three rooted mandibular first molars- survey of available studies
Click here to view |
 | Table 4: Previous reports concerning radix entomolaris and number of distal canals
Click here to view |
[Table 5] presents case report of c-shape canals in mandibular first molar.
[Table 6] and [Table 7] presents studies and case reports of taurodontism in mandibular first molar.
| Discussion | | |
Variations in morphology of mandibular first molars
In 35% of cases, four canals are present. The distal root contains two canals, one in the buccal and the other in the lingual position. The second distal canal is sometimes found in a separate root in the distolingual position. Sometimes, the "extra" canal is found in the mesial root, which therefore contains three canals. This is the middle mesial canal [MMC] [92] [Figure 3]. | Figure 3: Mandibular first molar depicting three root canal orifices on mesial root
Click here to view |
In addition, cases with three canals in the distal root and two in the mesial root, [58],[59] two canals in the mesial root and three canals in three distal roots, [93] two canals in the disto-lingual root, [67] two roots and one canal in each, [94] Four canals in mesial root of mandibular molar, [95] molar with seven canals: 2 mesiobuccal, 2 mesiolingual and 3 distal canals [96] were reported.
Extra canal phenomenon
It has been postulated that secondary dentine apposition during tooth maturation will form a dentinal vertical partition inside the canal cavity, thus creating the root canals. The third root canal may be created inside the root cavity of the mandibular molar by this process. [11],[12] The larger mesio distal dimension of the single distal root, compared to that of the single mesial root, may account for the rare incidence of the third canal created by dentine apposition in a single distal root. [10],[60],[63] Other possible reasons for the presence of extra root canals include role of external factors during odontogenesis, penetrance of an atavistic gene and more importantly racial genetic factors. [20]
Middle mesial canal (MMC) in the permanent mandibular first molar
The presence of an independent middle mesial canal with a separate orifice and a separate apical foramen was reported in 1974 by Vertucci and Williams [22] and Barker et al.[97]
In 1981, Pomeranz et al,[22] presented a more comprehensive report in which they discussed the in vivo occurrence, instrumentation, and obturation of the middle mesial root canal system of mandibular first and second molars in 12 clinical cases. They classified three separate morphological possibilities in the mesial root [Figure 4]: | Figure 4: Pomeranz et al. classification of middle mesial canal. (a) and (b) are classifi ed as confluent where MMC joins Mesiolingual and Mesiobuccal respectively. (c) Represents independent MMC
Click here to view |
- The middle mesial canal was classified as a fin when at any stage during debridement; the instrument could pass freely between the mesiobuccal or mesiolingual canal and the middle mesial canal.
- The middle mesial canal was classified as confluent when the prepared canal originated as a separate orifice but apically joined the mesiobuccal or mesiolingual canal.
- The middle mesial canal was classified as independent when the prepared canal originated as a separate orifice and terminated as a separate foramen.
In 1982, Weine [7] reported a case of a mandibular molar in which a separate middle mesial root canal was located when the case was retreated. The presence of a third canal in the mesial root of mandibular first molars has been reported to have an incidence rate of 1 to 15%. [20] In 1985 and 1989, Fabra-Campos displayed middle mesial canal in 2.1% and 2.6% of the teeth respectively [18],[19] A radiographic study of extracted teeth reported mandibular first molars with three mesial canals in 13.3% of specimens, four mesial canals in 3.3% of specimens, and three distal canals in 1.7% of specimens. [25] Evangelos G [95] has demonstrated four canals in the mesial root of mandibular first molar performed under operating microscope. Aminsobhani M [98] reported 21 cases of mandibular first molar with three mesial canals of which 13 molars presented with vertucci's canal configuration - 3-2; 4 molars 3-1 and other 4 molars with 3-2-1 canal configuration. Faramarzi F reported a case of mandibular first molar with three mesial canals and broken instrument removal. [99]
According to Mortman, [8] the third mesial canal is not an extra canal but rather the sequelae of instrumenting the isthmus between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals. The isthmus is located in between 54% and 89% of cases, most frequently between 4mm and 6mm from the apical foramen.
According to Von Arx, [100] isthmuses in the mesial root of mandibular first molars may be classified into 5 types [Figure 5]: Type I is two separate canals, type II is two separate canals joined by an isthmus, type III is three canals joined by an isthmus, type IV is two elongated canals that join in the centre and type V is a single, very broad and elongated canal. | Figure 5: (a) Type I is two separate canals, (b) Type II is two separate canals joined by an isthmus, (c) Type III is three canals joined by an isthmus, (d) Type IV is two elongated canals that join in the centre and (e) Type V is a single, very broad and elongated canal
Click here to view |
In order to easily locate these intermediate canals within the mesial root these four steps are suggested by Fabra-Campos [18]
- Once the access cavity is made the dentinal protuberance which separates the entrance to the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals are removed with either ultrasonic tips or round bur
- An explorer is used to explore through the groove connecting the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canal to search for any possible intermediate depression. Also in teeth with vital pulp a bleeding spot can be observed which may indicate MMC
- Catheterize the third canal by using a thin file (#08 or 10) in an alternating 45-deg rotating motion
- Once the canal is located enlarge canal entrance. Most of the time this intermediate canal will join at the apical or middle third with either the mesiolingual or mesiobuccal canal, ending in one foramen. This intermediate canal joins more frequently with the mesiobuccal canal. Various authors [7],[10],[18],[19] have suggested that younger patients had intermediate canals which were more easily found.
Fabro-Campos [19] in his case report suggested that the intermediate canal should not be enlarged as much as the main canal because of the danger of perforation. This in turn makes obturation of the canal more difficult as spreaders cannot be introduced to the correct level during lateral condensation techniques.
Finally diagnostic measures such as multiple preoperative radiographs, examination of pulp chamber floor with a sharp explorer, troughing of the grooves with ultrasonic tips, staining the pulp chamber floor, visualization of bleeding points and with use of magnification, the middle mesial canal can be detected and treated for the success of the root canal treatment.
Three rooted mandibular first molar (Supernumerary root)
Three-rooted mandibular first molars (3RM1) were first described in England by A. E. Taylor in 1899. Since then, investigators have reported 3RM1 in various frequencies in human populations, and it was noticed that 3RM1 was higher in most Asian populations. [101]
In a worldwide survey of 11,318 individuals from 286 prehistoric skeletal and recent populations, Turner and Benjamin found 3RM1 most common in Asian and Asian-derived populations, especially in the Arctic and North Asian populations (25-30%) and least common (1%) in European and African groups. [102]
Tratman (1950) pointed out that the incidence of distolingual root is more when it occurs on deciduous second molar and is only present on first molar when there are five cusps. [103] The incidence of the distolingual root on first molar in the sexes as well as its presence on the left or right side is variable in the populations investigated to date. [103],[104]
Anthropologically, the presence of a three-rooted lower permanent first molar is significant. It is more commonly noted in Mongoloids than Caucasians and Negroids. [105]
Radix entomolaris
The major variant in mandibular first molar is the presence of an additional third root; a supernumerary root which can be found distolingually. This macrostructure, which is first mentioned in the literature by Carabelli (1844), is called radix entomolaris (RE). [66] Some studies reported a bilateral occurrence of the RE from 50% to 67%. [106],[107]
In European populations it has been reported that a separate RE is present in the mandibular first molar with a maximum frequency of 3.4-4.2%. [33],[35],[36],[107] In African populations a maximum of 3% is found. [42] In Eurasian and Indian populations the frequency is less than 5%. [34] In populations with Mongoloid traits, such as Chinese, Eskimo and American Indians, the RE occurs with a frequency of 5% to more than 40%. [34],[37],[40],[41],[42],[46]
In addition to anthropological interest, the 3RM1 has a role as genetic marker [108] and also has significance in clinical dentistry. [109]
The RE is located distolingually, with its coronal third completely or partially fixed to the distal root. The dimensions of the RE can vary from a short conical extension to a 'mature' root with normal length and root canal. The distolingual root may be separate from or partially fused with the other roots. [70]
The RE could be classified in three groups on the basis of the curve of the root/root canal. This classification is based on a classification proposed by Ribeiro and Consolaro (1997) [Figure 6]: Type I refers to a straight root/root canal, type II to an initially curved entrance and the continuation as a straight root/root canals, type III to an initial curve in the coronal third of the root canal and a second buccally orientated curve starting from the middle to apical third. [110] | Figure 6: Ribeiro and Consolaro's classification of RE: (a) type I refers to a straight root/root canal, (b) type II to an initially curved entrance and the continuation as a straight root/root canals, (c) type III to an initial curve in the coronal third of the root canal and a second buccally orientated curve starting from the middle to apical third
Click here to view |
A classification by Carlsen and Alexandersen describes four different types of RE according to the location of the cervical part of the RE [Figure 7]: Types A, B, C and AC. Types A and B refer to a distally located cervical part of the RE with two normal and one normal distal root components, respectively. Type C refers to a mesially located cervical part while type AC refers to a central location between the distal and mesial root components. [109] | Figure 7: Carlsen and Alexandersen's classifi cation of RE. (a & b) Types A and B refer to a distally located cervical part of the RE with two normal and one normal distal root components, respectively, (c) Type C refers to a mesially located cervical part, (d) AC refers to a central location, between the distal and mesial root component
Click here to view |
Calberson et al,[70] described the clinical approach for the treatment of mandibular molar with radix entomolaris. These can be summarized as follows
- An angled radiograph in addition to preoperative radiograph is essential for accurate diagnosis of RE.
- Clinically, analyze the cervical morphology of roots by means of periodontal probing. Presence of an extra cusp or more prominent occlusal distal or distolingual lobe in combination with a cervical prominence or convexity can indicate the presence of an additional root.
- The orifice of the RE can be located disto- to mesiolingually from the main canal or canals in the distal root. An extension of the triangular opening cavity to the (disto) lingual results in a more rectangular or trapezoidal outline form.
- An initial relocation of the orifice to the lingual is indicated to achieve straight-line access.
- A straight line access, initial root canal exploration with small files (size 10 or less) together with root canal length and curvature determination and the creation of a glide path before preparation are step-by-step actions that should be taken to avoid procedural errors.
Radix Paramolaris
Bolk [111] reported the occurrence of a buccally located additional root in mandibular first molar: The radix paramolaris (RP). This macrostructure is very rare and occurs less frequently than the RE. The prevalence of RP as observed by Visser, [112] was found to be 0% for the first mandibular molar, 0.5% for the second and 2% for the third molar. Other studies have however, reported RP in first mandibular molars. [113],[41]
The RP is located (mesio) buccally. As with the RE the dimensions of the RP can vary from a 'mature' root with a root canal to a short conical extension. This additional root can be separate or non separate. [112] Carlsen and Alexandersen describe two different types [Figure 8]: Types A and B. Type A refers to an RP in which the cervical part is located on the mesial root complex; type B refers to an RP in which the cervical part is located centrally between the mesial and distal root complexes. [114] | Figure 8: Carlsen and Alexandersen's classification of RP. (a) Type A refers to an RP in which the cervical part is located on the mesial root complex; (b) Type B refers to an RP in which the cervical part is located centrally, between the mesial and distal root complexes
Click here to view |
C-Shaped mandibular first molar
The C-shaped canal was first documented in endodontic literature by Cooke and Cox in 1979, [115] is so named for the cross-sectional morphology of the root and root canal. Instead of having several discrete orifices the pulp chamber of the C-shaped canal is a single ribbon-shaped orifice with a 180° arc (or more), which in mandibular molars starts at the mesiolingual line angle and sweeps around the buccal to end at the distal aspect of the pulp chamber. [116]
Typically, this canal configuration is found in the teeth with fusion of the roots either on its buccal or lingual aspect. In such teeth, the floor of the pulp chamber is usually situated deeply and may assume an unusual anatomic appearance. [114] The main anatomic feature of C-shaped canals is the presence of a fin or web connecting the individual root canals. [117]
Investigations of root development in mouse molars showed that roots were formed by the meeting of dentine leaflets. The fusing of these leaflets was sometimes irregular, forming accessory canals and occasionally, especially in the third molars the leaflets failed to form. In the case of mandibular molars such failure of dentine leaflet formation resulted in a C-shaped root and root canal. [118]
Once recognized the C-shaped canal provides a challenge with respect to debridement and obturation, especially because it is unclear whether the C-shaped orifice found on the floor of the pulp chamber actually continues to the apical third of the root. [119] Fused and C-shaped roots may present with narrow grooves that predispose to localized periodontal disease which may in fact be the first diagnostic indication of such anatomic variation. [120]
For the successful treatment of such C-shape canals following points should be taken into consideration.
Radio graphically it may present as a single fused root or as two distinct roots. [6] Cooke and Cox stated that it is impossible to diagnose C-shaped canals on the radiographs. [115] Radiographs taken while probing the root canal system reveal two characteristics: Instruments tend to converge at the apex; [74] instruments appear clinically and radio graphically to perforate the furcation. [121]
Clinical recognition of C-shaped canals is based on specific anatomy of pulp chamber, difficult to control bleeding because of anastomosis, [122] large pulp chamber in occluso-apical dimension with deep lying bifurcation. [123]
After routine access cavity preparation and removal of pulp tissue the orifice portions of the slit must be widened considerably early in treatment but not too deeply toward the apex. [124]
In C-shaped molars the mesiolingual canal is separate and distinct from the apex, although it may be significantly shorter than mesiobuccal or distal canals. The mesiobuccal canal may merge with distal canal and both exit through a single foramen or both canal have separate portals of exit. [125]
An increased volume of irrigant and deeper penetration with small instruments using sonics or ultrasonics may allow for more cleansibility. [121]
Combination of lateral condensation and application of thermoplasticized gutta-percha is more appropriate.
If endodontic surgical intervention is indicated for a molar with C-shaped root canal anatomy, strong considerations should be given to extraction, retro filling and intentional re-plantation. [115]
If post placement for a crown core is desired, use of only the distal canal should be considered. Placement of posts or antirotational pins in the mesiolingual and mesiobuccal areas invites perforation. [117]
Taurodontism
Witkop defined taurodontism as "teeth with large pulp chamber in which the bifurcation or trifurcation are displaced apically, so that the chamber has greater apicao-occlusal height than in normal teeth and lacks the constriction at the level of the cementoenamel junction." [89] [Figure 9] | Figure 9: Hypotaurodontism involving right mandibular first and second molar.
Click here to view |
The term taurodontism was coined by Sir Arthur Keith to describe the "bull-like" condition in teeth in which the tall root trunk encloses a high pulp chamber and short roots. [126] The etiology of taurodontism is unclear. It is thought to be caused by the failure of Hertwig's epithelial sheath diaphragm to invaginate at the proper horizontal level, resulting in a tooth with short roots, elongated body, an enlarged pulp, and normal dentin. Previously, taurodontism was related to syndromes such as Down's and Klinefelter's. Today, it is considered as an anatomic variance that could occur in a normal population. [127]
A taurodont does not exhibit any unique morphologic clinical characteristics which may aid in its recognition. The radiographic examination is the only way to visualize a rectangular configuration of the pulp chamber. The apico-occlusal height of the pulp chamber varies depending upon the type of taurodontism. [128] Shaw has classified taurodontism into hypo, meso, and hyper taurodontism on the basis of the apical displacement of the floor of the pulp chamber. [129]
The teeth most frequently affected are the molars diagnosed most easily by radiograph. Premolars present a lower incidence and the mandibular teeth more commonly affected than the maxillary teeth. [90]
Witkop et al,(1988) used the following reference points on radiographs for diagnosis of taurodontism: A as the lowest point of the occlusal end of the pulp chamber, B as the level at which the furcation of the roots occur and C as the position of the apex of the roots. If AB≥'/2 AC the tooth was considered to be taurodontic [Figure 10]. [130]
A taurodont tooth shows wide variation in the size and shape of the pulp chamber, varying degrees of obliteration and canal configuration, apically positioned canal orifices and the potential for additional root canal systems. Therefore, root canal treatment becomes a challenge. Access opening for such tooth is no different compared to other mandibular molars. Because the pulp of a taurodont is usually voluminous in order to ensure complete removal of the necrotic pulp, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite should be used along with ultrasonics. Because of the complexity of the root canal anatomy and the proximity of the buccal orifices, complete filling of the root canal system in taurodontism is challenging. A modified filling technique has been proposed, which consists of combined lateral compaction in the apical region with vertical compaction of the elongated pulp chamber, using the system B device. [130]
| Conclusion | | |
The mandibular molar is the first permanent molar to erupt into the oral cavity and it is most often tooth requiring endodontic therapy. The knowledge of root canal system and the most common variations should be kept in mind before starting root canal therapy. With the recent innovations of various operating aids, the coming era can witness more variations in the root canal morphology of permanent mandibular first molar.
| References | | |
| 1. | Parolia A, Kundabala M, Thomas MS, Mohan M, Joshi N. Three rooted, four canalled mandibular first molar (Radix Entomolaris). Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2009;7:289-92. 
|
| 2. | Reyhani MF, Rahimi S, Shahi S. Root canal therapy of a mandibular first molar with five root canals: A case report. Iran Endod J 2007;2:110-2
|
| 3. | Vertucci FJ, Haddix HE, Britto LR. Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation. In: Cohen S, editor. Pathways of pulp, 9 th ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2006. p. 220-2.
|
| 4. | Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;28:419-25.
|
| 5. | Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:589-99.
|
| 6. | Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Nq YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:359-70.
|
| 7. | Weine FS. Case report: three canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar(?) J Endod 1982;8:517-20.
|
| 8. | Mortman RE, Ahn S. Mandibular first molars with three mesial canals. Gen Dent 2003;51:549-51.
|
| 9. | Min KS. Clinical management of a mandibular first molar with multiple mesial canals: A case report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5:142-9.
|
| 10. | Matinez-Berna A, Badanelli P. Mandibular first molar with six root canals. J Endod 1985;8:348-52.
|
| 11. | Bond JL, Hartwell GR, Donnelly JC, Portell FR. Clinical management of middle mesial root canals in mandibular molars. J Endod 1988;14:312-4.
|
| 12. | Jocobsen EL, Dick K, Bodell R. Mandibular first molar with multiple canals. J Endod 1994;20:610-3.
|
| 13. | Ricucci D. Three independent canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997;13:47-9.
|
| 14. | Holtzman L. Root canal treatment of a mandibular first molar with three mesial root canals. Int Endodon J 1997;30:422-23.
|
| 15. | Yesilsoy C, Porras O, Gordon W. Importance of third mesial canals in mandibular molars: Report of 2 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e55-8.
|
| 16. | LaSH, JungDH, KimEC, MinKS. Identification of independent middle mesial canal in mandibular first molar using cone-beam computed tomography imaging. J Endod 2010;36:542-5.
|
| 17. | Poorni S, Anil Kumar R, Indira R. Canal complexity of a mandibular first molar. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:37-40.
[PUBMED]  |
| 18. | Fabra-Campos H. Unusual root anatomy of mandibular first molars. J Endod 1985;11:568-72.
|
| 19. | Fabra-Campos H. Three canals in the mesial root of mandibular first permanent molars: A clinical study. Int Endod J 1989;22:39-43.
|
| 20. | BaughD, Wallace J. Middle mesial canal of the mandibular first molar: A case report and literature review. J Endod 2004;30:185-6.
|
| 21. | DeGrood ME, Cunnigham CJ. Mandibular molar with 5 canals: Report of a case. J Endod 1997;23:60-2
|
| 22. | Vertucci FJ, Williams RG. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular first molar. J N J Dent Assoc 1974;48:27-8.
|
| 23. | Pomeranz HH, Eidelman DL, Goldberg MG. Treatment considerations of the middle mesial canal of mandibular first and second molars. J Endod 1981;7:565-8.
|
| 24. | Martinez-Baerna A, Badanelli P. Investigaci_on cl_ýnica de molares inferiores concinco conductos. Bol Inf Dent (Madr) 1983;43:27-41.
|
| 25. | Goel NK, Gill KS, Taneja JR. Study of roots canal configuration in mandibular first permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1991;8:12-4.
[PUBMED] |
| 26. | Caliskan MK, PehlivanY, SepetciogluF, TurkunM, Tuncer SS. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995;21:200-4.
|
| 27. | Wasti F, Shearer AC, Wilson NH. Root canal systems of the mandibular and maxillary first permanent molar teeth of south Asian Pakistanis. Int Endod J 2001;34:263-6.
|
| 28. | Sarkar S, Rao AP. Number of root canals, their shape, configuration, accessory root canals in radicular pulp morphology. A preliminary study. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent 2002;20:93-7.
|
| 29. | Navarro LF, Luzi A, Garcia AA, Garcia AH. Third canal in the mesial root of permanent mandibular first molars: Review of the literature and presentation of 3 clinical reports and 2 in vitro studies. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:E605-9.
|
| 30. | Shahi S, Yavari HR, Rahimi S, Torkamani R. Root canal morphology of human mandibular first permanent molars in an Iranian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2008;2:20-3.
|
| 31. | Chen G, Yao H, Tong C. Investigation of the root canal configuration of mandibular first molars in a Taiwan Chinese population. Int Endod J 2009;42:1044-9.
|
| 32. | Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2009;42:775-84.
|
| 33. | Taylor AE. Variation in the human tooth-form as met with in isolated teeth. J Anat Physiol 1899;33(Pt 2):268-72.
|
| 34. | Tratman EK. Three-rooted lower molars in man and their racial distribution. Br Dent J 1938;64:264-74.
|
| 35. | Skidmore AE, Bjorndal AM. Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:778-84.
|
| 36. | Turner CG. Three-rooted mandibular first permanent molars and the question of American Indian origins. Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;34:229-42.
|
| 37. | Curzon ME. Three-rooted mandibular permanent molars in English Caucasians. J Dent Res 1973;52:181.
|
| 38. | Younes SA, al-ShammeryAR, el-Angbawi MF. Three-rooted permanent mandibular first molars of Asian and black groups in the Middle East. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:102-5.
|
| 39. | Loh HS. Incidence and features of three-rooted permanent mandibular molars. Aust Dent J 1990;35:434-7.
|
| 40. | Ferraz JA, Pécora JD. Three rooted mandibular molars in patients of Mongolian, Caucasian and Negro origin. Braz Dent J 1992;3:113-7.
|
| 41. | Yew SC, Chan K. A retrospective study of endodontically treated mandibular first molars in Chinese population. J Endod 1993;19:471-3.
|
| 42. | Sperber GH, Moreau JL. Study of the number of roots and canals in Senegalese first permanent mandibular molars. Int Endod J 1998;31:117-22.
|
| 43. | Zaatar EI, al Anizi SA, al Duwairi Y. A study of the dental pulp cavity of mandibular first permanent molars in the Kuwaiti population. J Endod 1998;24:125-7.
|
| 44. | al-Nazhan S. Incidence of four canals in root-canal treated mandibular first molars in Saudi Arabian sub-population. Int Endod J 1999;32:49-52.
|
| 45. | Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars.Int Endod J2002;35:56-62.
|
| 46. | AhmedHA, Abu-bakrNH, YahiaNA, IbrahimYE. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population. Int Endod J 2007;40:766-71.
|
| 47. | Peiris R, Takahashi M, Sasaki K, Kanazawa E. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sri Lankan population. Odontology 2007;95:16-23.
|
| 48. | Jayasinghe RD, Ka-LunLi T. Three-rooted first permanent mandibular molars in a Hong Kong Chinese population: A computed tomographic study. Hong Kong Dent J 2007;4:90-3.
|
| 49. | Pattanshetti N, Gaidhane M, al Kandari AM. Root and canal morphology of the mesiobuccal and distal roots of permanent first molars in a Kuwait population: A clinical study. Int Endod J 2008;41:755-62.
|
| 50. | Rwenyonyi CM, Kutesa A, Muwazi LM, Buwembo W. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second permanent molar teeth in a Ugandan population. Odontology 2009;97:92-6.
|
| 51. | Song JS, Kim SO, Choi BJ, Choi HJ, Son HK, Lee JH. Incidence and relationship of an additional root in the mandibular first permanent molar and primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e56-60.
|
| 52. | Schäfer E, Breuer D, Janzen S. The Prevalence of three-rooted mandibular permanent first molars in a german population. J Endod2009;35:202-5.
|
| 53. | Chen YC, Lee YY, PaiSF, Yang SF. The morphologic characteristics of the distolingual roots of mandibular first molars in a Taiwanese population. J Endod2009;35:643-5.
|
| 54. | Tu MG, Huang HL, Hsue SS, Hsu JT, Chen SY, Jou MJ, et al. Detection of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars by cone-beam computed tomography imaging in Taiwanese individuals. J Endod 2009;35:503-7.
|
| 55. | Huang CC, Chang YC, Chuang MC, Lai TM, Lai JY, Lee BS, et al. Evaluation of root and canal systems of mandibular first molars in Taiwanese individuals using cone-beam computed tomography. J Formos Med Assoc 2010;109:303-8.
|
| 56. | Song JS, Choi HJ, Jung IY, Jung HS, Kim SO. The prevalence and morphologic classification of distolingual roots in the mandibular molars in a Korean population. J Endod 2010;36:653-7.
|
| 57. | Garg AK, Tewari RK, Kumar A, Hashmi SH, Agrawal N, Mishra SK. Prevalence of Three-rooted Mandibular Permanent First Molars among the Indian Population. J Endod 2010;36:1302-6.
|
| 58. | Stroner WF, Remeikis NA, Carr GB. Mandibular first molar with three distal canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57:554-7.
|
| 59. | Beatty RG, Interian CM. A Mandibular first molar with five canals: Report of case. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111:769-71.
|
| 60. | Quackenbush LE. Mandibular molar with three distal root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:48-9.
|
| 61. | Friedman S, Moshonov J, Stabholz A. Five root canals in a mandibular first molar. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:226-8.
|
| 62. | Reeh ES. Seven canals in a lower first molar. J Endod 1998;24:497-9.
|
| 63. | Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Mandibular first molar with three distal root canals. Int Endod J2000;33:468-70.
|
| 64. | Segura-Egea JJ, Jimenez-Pinzon A, Rios-Santos JV. Endodontic therapy in a 3-rooted mandibular first molar: Importance of a thorough radiographic examination. J Can Dent Assoc 2002;68:541-4.
|
| 65. | Yeh SC, Huang HL. Two canals in distolingual root of mandibular first permanent molar - Case report. Chin Dent J 2003;22:53-7.
|
| 66. | De Moor RJ, Deroose CA, Calberson FL. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: An endodontic challenge. Int Endod J 2004;37:789-99.
|
| 67. | Lee SJ, Jang KH, Spangberg LS, Kim E, Jung IY, Lee CY, et al. Three-dimensional visualization of a mandibular first molar with three distal roots using computer-aided rapid prototyping. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:668-74.
|
| 68. | Ghoddusi J, Naghavi N, Zarei M, Rohani E. Mandibular first molar with four distal canals. J Endod 2007;33:1481-3.
|
| 69. | Barletta FB, Dotto S, Reis M, Ferreira R, Colho RM. Mandibular molar with five root canals. Aust Endod J 2007;34:129-32.
|
| 70. | Calberson FL, De Moor RJ, Deroose CA. The radix entomolaris and paramolaris: Clinical approach in endodontics. J Endod 2007;33:58-63.
|
| 71. | Tu MG, Chen SY, Hsue SS, Huang HL, Tsai CC. Removal of a separated nickel-titanium instrument from a three-rooted mandibular first molar. Mid Taiwan J Med 2009;14:27-33.
|
| 72. | Chandra SS, Rajasekaran M, Shankar P, Indira R. Endodontic management of a mandibular first molar with three distal canals confirmed with the aid of spiral computerized tomography: A case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e77-81.
|
| 73. | Mirikar P, Shenoy A, Mallikarjun GK. Nonsurgical management of endodontic mishaps in a case of radix entomolaris. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:169-74.
[PUBMED] |
| 74. | Barnett F. Mandibular molar with C-shaped canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:79-81.
|
| 75. | Rice RT, Gilbert BO. An unusual canal configuration in a mandibular first molar. J Endod 1987;13:515-5.
|
| 76. | Bolger WL, Schindler WG. A Mandibular first molar with a C-shaped root configuration. J Endod 1988;14:515-9.
|
| 77. | Keene HJ. A morphologic and biometric study of taurodontism in a contemporary population. Am J Phys Anthropol 1966;25:208-9.
|
| 78. | Blumberg JE, Hylander WL, Goepp RA. Taurodontism: A biometric study. Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;34:243-55.
|
| 79. | Shifman A, Chanannel I. Prevalence of taurodontism found in radiographic dental examination of 1,200 young adult Israeli patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:200-3.
|
| 80. | Jorgenson RJ, Salinas CF, Shapiro SD. The prevalence of taurodontism in a select population. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1982;2:125-35.
|
| 81. | Ruprecht A, Batniji S, el-Neweihi E. The incidence of taurodontism in dental patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:743-7.
|
| 82. | MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Li TT. Taurodontism in a young adult Chinese population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;22:140-4.
|
| 83. | Sarr M, Toure B, Kane AW, Fall F, Wone MM. Taurodontism and the pyramidal tooth at the level of the molar. Prevalence in the Senegalese population 15 to 19 years of age. Odontostomatol Trop 2000;23:31-4.
|
| 84. | Park GJ, Kim SK, Kim S, Lee CH. Prevalence and pattern of dental developmental anomalies in Korean children. J Oral Pathol Med 2006;35:453.
|
| 85. | Hamner JE, Witkop CJ Jr, Metro PS. Taurodontism: Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;18:409-18.
|
| 86. | Mena CA. Taurodontism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:812-23.
|
| 87. | Goldstein E, Gottlieb MA. Taurodontism: Familial tendencies demonstrated in eleven of fourteen case reports. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:131-44.
|
| 88. | Shifman A, Buchner A. Taurodontism: Report of sixteen cases in Israel. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976,41;400-5.
|
| 89. | Sathyanarayana R, Carounanidy U. Taurodontism - Review and an endodontic case report. Endodontology 2001;13:8-10.
|
| 90. | Tiku A, Damle SG, Nadkarni UM, Kalaskar RR. Hypertaurodontism in molars and premolars: Management of two rare cases. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2003;21:131-4.
[PUBMED] |
| 91. | Ashwin R, Arathi R.Taurodontism of deciduous and permanent molars: Report of two cases. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006;24:42-4.
|
| 92. | Arnold castellucci. Access Cavity and Endodontic Anatomy. Endodontics, 1 st ed, Florence, Italy, IL Tridente; 2004. p. 291-2
|
| 93. | Friedman S, Moshonov J, Stabholz A. Five root canals in a mandibular first molar. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:226-8.
|
| 94. | Krithikadatta J, Kottoor J, Karumaran CS, Rajan G. Mandibular first molar having unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: A case report. J Endod 2010;36:1712-6.
|
| 95. | Kontakiotis EG, Tzanetakis GN. Four canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar. A case report under the operating microscope. Aust Endod J 2007;33:84-8.
|
| 96. | Reeh ES. Seven canals in a lower first molar. J Endod 1998;24:497-9.
|
| 97. | Barker BC, Parsons KC, Mills PR, Williams GL. Anatomy of root canals. III. Permanent Mandibular molars. Aust Dent J 1974;19:408-13.
|
| 98. | Aminsobhani M, Bolhari B, Shokouhinejad N, Ghorbanzadeh A, Ghabraei S, Rahmani MG. Mandibular first and second molars with three mesial canals: A case series. Iran Endod J 2010;5:36-9.
|
| 99. | Faramarzi F, Fakri H, Javaheri HH. Endodontic treatment of a mandibular first molar with three mesial canals and broken instrument removal. Aust Endod J 2010;36:39-41.
|
| 100. | Von Arx T. Frequency and type of canal isthmuses in first molars detected by endoscopic inspection during periradicular surgery. Int Endod J 2005;38:160-8.
|
| 101. | Drusini AG, Swindler DR. Frequency and variation of three-rooted lower first permanent molars in precontact Easter Islanders and in Pre-Conquest Peruvians. Dent Anthropol 2009;22:1-6.
|
| 102. | Turner CG II, Benjamin O. World variation in three-rooted lower first permanent molars. Paper read at the 8 th International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Jerusalem, Israel: 1990.
|
| 103. | Tratman EK. Comparison of teeth of people of Indo-European racial stock with the Mongoloid racial stock. Dent Rec 1950;70:31-53.
|
| 104. | Turner CG 2 nd . Three-rooted mandibular first permanent molars and the question of American Indian origins. Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;34:229-41.
|
| 105. | Turner CG 2 nd . Major features of Sundadonty and Sinodonty including suggestions about East Asian microevolution, population history and late Pleistocene relationships with Australian aboriginals. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990;82:295-317.
|
| 106. | Yew SC, Chan K. A retrospective study of endodontically treated mandibular first molars in Chinese population. J Endod 1993;19:471-3.
|
| 107. | Steelman R. Incedence of an accessory distal root on mandibular first permanent molars in Hispanic children. ASDC J Dent Child 1986;53:122-3.
|
| 108. | Curzon ME. Miscegenation and the prevalence of three-rooted mandibular first molars in Baffin Eskimo. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1974;2:130-1.
|
| 109. | Carlsen O, Alexandersen V. Radix entomolaris: Identification and morphology. Scan J Dent Res 1990;98:363-73.
|
| 110. | Ribeiro FC, Consolaro A. Anthropological and clinical importance of distolingual root in the permanent lower molars. Endodoncia 1997;15:72-8
|
| 111. | Bolk L. Series belong to the molars? Z Morphol Anthropol 1914;17:83-116
|
| 112. | Visser JB. Contribution to the knowledge of human dental root forms. Rotting 1948; 29:49-72.
|
| 113. | Carlsen O, Alexandersen V. Radix paramolaris in permanent mandibular molars: Identification and morphology. Scan J Dent Res 1991;99:189-95.
|
| 114. | Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part I-Anatomical features. J Endod 2004;30:899-903.
|
| 115. | Cooke HG 3 rd , Cox FL. C-shaped canal configurations in mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:836-9.
|
| 116. | Jafarzadeh H, Wu YN. The C-shaped Root Canal Configuration: A review. J Endod 2007;33:517-23.
|
| 117. | Jerome CE. C-shaped root canal systems: Diagnosis, treatment, and restoration. Gen Dent 1994;42:424-7; quiz 433-4.
|
| 118. | Manning SA. Root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars. Part II. C-shaped canals. Int Endod J 1990;23:40-5
|
| 119. | Barril I, Cochet JY, Ricci C. Treatment of a canal with a "C" configuration. Rev Fr Endod 1989;8:47-58.
|
| 120. | Haddad GY, Nehme WB, Ounsi HF. Diagnosis, classification, and frequency of C -shaped canals in mandibular second molars in the Lebanese population. J Endod 1999;25:268-71.
|
| 121. | Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW. Anatomical and histological features of C -shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endod1991;17:384-8.
|
| 122. | Lambrianidis T, Lyroudia K, Pandelidou O, Nicolaou A. Evaluation of periapical radiographs in the recognition of C -shaped mandibular second molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:458-62.
|
| 123. | Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1994. p. 1841-89.
|
| 124. | Weine FS. The C -shaped mandibular second molar: Incidence, and other considerations. J Endod 1998;24:372-8.
|
| 125. | Keith A. Problems relating to the teeth of the earlier forms of prehistoric man. Proc R Soc Med 1913;6:103-24.
|
| 126. | Tsesis I, Shifman A, Kaufman AY. Taurodontism: An endodontic challenge. report of a case. J Endod 2003;29:353-5.
|
| 127. | Saini T, Wilson CA. Taurodont molars: Review of literature and radiological features. Saudi Dent J 1990;2:68-70.
|
| 128. | Shaw JC. Taurodont teeth in South African races. J Anat 1928;62:476-98.
|
| 129. | Schalk-Van der Weide Y, Steen WH, Bosman F. Taurodontism and length of teeth in patients with oligodontia. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:401-12.
|
| 130. | Jafarzadeh H, Azarpazhooh A, Mayhall JT. Taurodontism: A review of the condition and endodontic treatment challenges. Int Endod J 2008;41:375-88.
|
Correspondence Address:
Srinidhi V Ballullaya
Senior lecturer, St Joseph Dental College, Duggirala, Eluru, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.108176
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7] |
|
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Middle mesial canal in mandibular first molar: A narrative review |
|
| Raghavendra Penukonda, Harshada Pattar, Phrabhakaran Nambiar, Afaf Al-Haddad | | The Saudi Dental Journal. 2023; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Evaluation of interorifice distance in permanent mandibular first molar with middle mesial canal in Bengaluru city, Karnataka: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
|
| Shruthika Mahajan, N. Meena, Anithakumari Rangappa, Ali Mohammed Mashood, Chethana Murthy, M. Lokapriya | | Endodontology. 2023; 35(2): 100 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Root and canal morphology of mandibular first molars in a Moroccan subpopulation by cone-beam computed tomography and its international comparison: A cross-sectional study |
|
| Sofia Drouri, Said Dhaimy, Imane Benkiran, Mouna Jabri, Zineb Al Jalil, Mouna Hamza | | Journal of International Oral Health. 2022; 14(1): 94 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Prevalence of radix entomolaris in India and its comparison with the rest of the world |
|
| Sumit MOHAN, Jyoti THAKUR | | Minerva Dental and Oral Science. 2022; 71(2) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
MANAGEMENT OF RADIX ENTOMOLARIS WITH THE MIDDLE MESIAL CANAL – A CASE REPORT |
|
| Sana Iqbal, Rohit Kochhar, Manju Kumari | | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. 2022; : 52 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
A Rare Occurrence of Bilateral Single-Rooted Mandibular First Molar |
|
| Urvashi Ujariya, Rajendra Bharatiya, Anjali Kothari, Viraj Shah, Mishri Parikh, Kruti Pandey, Dhara Mehta, Nishi Amin, Leandro Napier de Souza | | Case Reports in Dentistry. 2022; 2022: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Root and root canal diversity in human permanent maxillary first premolars and first molars in inhabitants from the ancient Middle Euphrates Valley (Syria) |
|
| Agata Przesmycka, Jacek Tomczyk, Marta Zalewska, Piotr Regulski | | International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Success of Orthodontic Space Closure Vs. Implant in The Management of Missing First Molar: Systematic Review |
|
| Ahmed Abdullah Bahamid, Felwa Sulaiman AlHudaithi, Abdulrahman Nasser Aldawsari, Abdulrahman Khalid Eyyd, Nawaf Yasir Alsadhan, Faten Abdullah Mesfer Alshahrani | | Annals of Dental Specialty. 2022; 10(4): 9 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
Variations in root canal morphology of the permanent mandibular first molar in Indian population- A CBCT study |
|
| Vasavi Santosh, Rhea Reji John, Mandavi Waghmare, Reema Manoj | | IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging. 2021; 7(2): 61 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
Root and canal configurations of mandibular first molars in a South African subpopulation |
|
| Sheree Tredoux, Nichola Warren, Glynn D. Buchanan | | Journal of Oral Science. 2021; 63(3): 252 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 11 |
Assessment of root morphology and canal configuration of maxillary premolars in a Saudi subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomographic study |
|
| Saad M. Al-Zubaidi, Moazzy I. Almansour, Nada N. Al Mansour, Ahad S. Alshammari, Ahad F. Alshammari, Yazeed S. Altamimi, Ahmed A. Madfa | | BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 12 |
A novel system for classifying tooth root phenotypes |
|
| Jason Gellis, Robert Foley, Lynne A. Schepartz | | PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(11): e0251953 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 13 |
Ethnical Anatomical Differences in Mandibular First Permanent Molars between Indian and Saudi Arabian Subpopulations: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study |
|
| Abdulwahab Alamir, Mohammed Mashyakhy, Apathsakayan Renugalakshmi, Mazen Alkahtany, Thilla S Vinothkumar, Anandhi S Arthisri, Ahmed Juraybi | | The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2021; 22(5): 484 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 14 |
Endodontic Management of a Permanent Mandibular First Molar with Five Root Canals Aided by Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Case Report
|
|
| Rakesh Mittal, Monika Tandan, Aditi Kohli | | Conservative Dentistry and Endodontic Journal. 2021; 5(2): 48 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 15 |
Variations of mandibular first molar root canal in school children: An observational study |
|
| Santosh Kumar, Alisha Singh, P Mohammed Ashik, Sarin Koroth, AkashNarayan Dutta Barua, AmitabhKumar Sinha | | Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences. 2020; 12(5): 238 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 16 |
Endodontic management of radix entomolaris with middle mesial canal –A case report |
|
| Ipsita Pathak, Nazia Ali,, Praveen Singh Samant, Raju Chauhan | | IP Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics. 2020; 5(3): 147 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 17 |
Stress Analyses of Retrograde Cavity Preparation Designs for Surgical Endodontics in the Mesial Root of the Mandibular Molar: A Finite Element Analysis—Part II |
|
| Sunil Kim, Dongzi Chen, So-Young Park, Chan-Joo Lee, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Euiseong Kim | | Journal of Endodontics. 2020; 46(4): 539 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 18 |
Stress Analyses of Retrograde Cavity Preparation Designs for Surgical Endodontics in the Mesial Root of the Mandibular Molar: A Finite Element Analysis—Part I |
|
| Sunil Kim, So-Young Park, Yoon Lee, Chan-Joo Lee, Bekir Karabucak, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Euiseong Kim | | Journal of Endodontics. 2019; 45(4): 442 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 19 |
Middle distal canal of mandibular first molar: A case report and literature review |
|
| DÖ Kirici, S Koç | | Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019; 22(2): 285 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 28511 | | | Printed | 444 | | | Emailed | 0 | | | PDF Downloaded | 947 | | | Comments | [Add] | | | Cited by others | 19 | | |
|
|
