| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2010 | Volume
: 13
| Issue : 3 | Page : 152-155 |
|
|
Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite
Roula Al-Boni, Ola M Raja
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
Correspondence Address:
Ola M Raja
Faiz Mansour St., Damascus University, Dentistry College, Damascus
Syria
 Source of Support: Damascus University, Damascus, Syria, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.71649
|
|
|
Aim : Our study aimed to analyze the microleakage of silorane-based composite in comparison to two homologous methacrylate-based composites.
Materials and Methods : Standardized class I cavities (4 × 2.5 × 3 mm) were prepared on extracted human premolars and randomly assigned into three groups (N = 15) as follows: Group A, Filtek P90 (silorane) with its dedicated adhesive system (P90 system adhesive); Group B, Adper SE Plus with Filtek Z250; Group C, Peak SE with Amelogen Plus. The teeth were subjected to thermocycling regime (200×, 5-55°C) and dye penetration of tooth sections were evaluated following 30 minute immersion in 2% Methylene Blue dye. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test at 95% significance level.
Results : Silorane exhibited significantly decreased microleakage compared with any other resin based composite (RBC). The cavities restored with Amelogen Plus displayed nonsignificantly higher microleakage than with Filtek Z250.
Conclusion : Although all of the restorative systems had microleakage, silorane technology showed less microleakage comparable to clinically successful methacrylate-based composite. This will improve the clinical performance and extend the composite durability. |
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
