Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 7334
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 107-112

Comparison Of Three Different Pre-Fabricated Post Systems With Custom Post System For Retention In The Root Canal – An In Vitro Evaluation

Correspondence Address:
G Parmar

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

When inadequate tooth structure remains for retention of a restoration, clinically acceptable method is the fabrication of a post and core. For many years, cast post and core. For many years, cast post and core has been in practice even they were time consuming. Prefabricated posts came into practice that seemed to be time saving and economical. Present study compares the retention of three different prefabricated post systems. Group I (control group) : Custom Cast Posts. Group II, III and IV : Prefabricated Para Post, Titanium threaded posts and Fiber glass posts respectively. Group III (titanium threaded posts) showed maximum retention values followed by custom cast posts para posts and galss fiber posts in descending grades of retention.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded83    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal