Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 221
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2000  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38-45

A Clinical Evaluation and Comparison Of Fuji II LC And Dyract (Compomer) In Cervical Abrasion - Erosion Lesions

Correspondence Address:
Nimisha Acharya

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Both Dyract and Fuji II LC were placed in class V non-carious abrasion erosion lesions and clinically evaluated for 6 months. Criteria taken for clinical evaluation were retention, marginal integrity, appearance and gingival condition of the restored tooth. After 6 months, it was seen that all retained restorations placed with Dyract and Fuji II LC were clinically acceptable, with greater esthetics with Dyract.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal