Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Check
Both Dyract and Fuji II LC were placed in class V non-carious abrasion erosion lesions and clinically evaluated for 6 months. Criteria taken for clinical evaluation were retention, marginal integrity, appearance and gingival condition of the restored tooth. After 6 months, it was seen that all retained restorations placed with Dyract and Fuji II LC were clinically acceptable, with greater esthetics with Dyract.
